Pain is Modulated Differently Between Females With and Without Patellofemoral Pain: Factors Related to Sensitization

Overview

Journal J Athl Train

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2024 Sep 17

PMID 39288152

Authors

Kemery J Sigmund

Marie K Hoeger Bement

Wendy E Huddleston

Kyle T Ebersole

Jennifer E Earl-Boehm

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Context: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) has poor long-term recovery outcomes. Central sensitization describes central nervous system changes altering pain modulation, which can complicate recovery (poorer prognosis and worse function). Signs of central sensitization include amplified pain facilitation, pain hypersensitivity, and impaired pain inhibition, which can be measured with temporal summation of pain (TSP), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), and conditioned pain modulation (CPM), respectively. Sex differences exist for these test responses, but female-only PFP investigations of sensitization are uncommon. Understanding pain modulation in females with PFP could improve treatment protocols.

Objective: To determine whether females with PFP exhibit signs of central sensitization (greater TSP, lower PPTs, and reduced CPM) compared with pain-free females.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Laboratory.

Patients Or Other Participants: Thirty-three females ([20 PFP, 13 pain free]; age: PFP 29.2 ± 7 years, pain free 28 ± 7 years; height: PFP 166.7 ± 5.9 cm, pain free 166 ± 9.5 cm; mass: PFP 66.7 ± 9.6 kg, pain free 69.3 ± 7.5 kg).

Main Outcome Measure(s): Temporal summation of pain was assessed with 10 punctate stimuli applied to the knee and calculated by the difference in pain intensity between beginning and end responses. Pressure pain thresholds were tested at 4 sites (3 for local hypersensitivity [knee] and 1 for widespread hypersensitivity [hand]). Conditioned pain modulation was conducted by comparing PPTs during 2 conditions (baseline and ice immersion). Conditioned pain modulation response was defined as the percent difference between conditions. Between-groups differences in TSP response were analyzed with a Welch test. Separate Welch tests analyzed group comparisons of PPTs and CPM responses at 4 sites.

Results: Females with PFP exhibited greater TSP response (P = .019) and lower CPM response at patella center (P = .010) and hand sites (P = .007) than pain-free females. Pressure pain thresholds group differences were not observed at any site (P > .0125).

Conclusions: Females with PFP modulate pain differently than pain-free females. Clinicians should recognize signs of central sensitization and their potential effect on treatment options.

References

Cook C, Mabry L, Reiman M, Hegedus E . Best tests/clinical findings for screening and diagnosis of patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2012; 98(2):93-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.09.001. View

Melzack R . The McGill pain questionnaire: from description to measurement. Anesthesiology. 2005; 103(1):199-202. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00028. View

Rathleff M, Rams Rathleff C, Stephenson A, Mellor R, Matthews M, Crossley K . Adults with patellofemoral pain do not exhibit manifestations of peripheral and central sensitization when compared to healthy pain-free age and sex matched controls - An assessor blinded cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2017; 12(12):e0188930. PMC: 5722372. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188930. View

Rathleff M, Petersen K, Arendt-Nielsen L, Thorborg K, Graven-Nielsen T . Impaired Conditioned Pain Modulation in Young Female Adults with Long-Standing Patellofemoral Pain: A Single Blinded Cross-Sectional Study. Pain Med. 2016; 17(5):980-8. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnv017. View

Lankhorst N, van Middelkoop M, Crossley K, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Oei E, Vicenzino B . Factors that predict a poor outcome 5-8 years after the diagnosis of patellofemoral pain: a multicentre observational analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015; 50(14):881-6. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094664. View

Chimenti R, Frey-Law L, Sluka K . A Mechanism-Based Approach to Physical Therapist Management of Pain. Phys Ther. 2018; 98(5):302-314. PMC: 6256939. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzy030. View

Nicholas M . The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: Taking pain into account. Eur J Pain. 2006; 11(2):153-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.12.008. View

Greenspan J, Craft R, LeResche L, Arendt-Nielsen L, Berkley K, Fillingim R . Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: a consensus report. Pain. 2007; 132 Suppl 1:S26-S45. PMC: 2823483. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.014. View

Osgood E, Trudeau J, Eaton T, Jensen M, Gammaitoni A, Simon L . Development of a bedside pain assessment kit for the classification of patients with osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2014; 35(6):1005-13. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-014-3191-z. View

10.

Roos E, Lohmander L . The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003; 1:64. PMC: 280702. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-64. View

11.

Treede R . The role of quantitative sensory testing in the prediction of chronic pain. Pain. 2019; 160 Suppl 1:S66-S69. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001544. View

12.

Piva S, Fitzgerald G, Irrgang J, Fritz J, Wisniewski S, McGinty G . Associates of physical function and pain in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90(2):285-95. PMC: 4876957. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.08.214. View

13.

Bartholomew C, Lack S, Neal B . Altered pain processing and sensitisation is evident in adults with patellofemoral pain: a systematic review including meta-analysis and meta-regression. Scand J Pain. 2019; 20(1):11-27. DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0079. View

14.

Hennings A, Schwarz M, Riemer S, Stapf T, Selberdinger V, Rief W . The influence of physical activity on pain thresholds in patients with depression and multiple somatoform symptoms. Clin J Pain. 2012; 28(9):782-9. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318243e2d1. View

15.

Eckenrode B, Kietrys D, Brown A, Parrott J, Noehren B . Signs of Nervous System Sensitization in Female Runners with Chronic Patellofemoral Pain. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023; 18(1):132-144. PMC: 9897008. DOI: 10.26603/001c.57603. View

16.

Nijs J, Goubert D, Ickmans K . Recognition and Treatment of Central Sensitization in Chronic Pain Patients: Not Limited to Specialized Care. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016; 46(12):1024-1028. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2016.0612. View

17.

Arendt-Nielsen L, Morlion B, Perrot S, Dahan A, Dickenson A, Kress H . Assessment and manifestation of central sensitisation across different chronic pain conditions. Eur J Pain. 2017; 22(2):216-241. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1140. View

18.

Crossley K, Bennell K, Cowan S, Green S . Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85(5):815-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00613-0. View

19.

Hopkins W, Batterham A . Error Rates, Decisive Outcomes and Publication Bias with Several Inferential Methods. Sports Med. 2016; 46(10):1563-73. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-016-0517-x. View

20.

Sigmund K, Bement M, Earl-Boehm J . Exploring the Pain in Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Examining Signs of Central Sensitization. J Athl Train. 2020; 56(8):887-901. PMC: 8359717. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0190.20. View