6.
Plateau J, Laming J, Lanimg D
. J. Plateau: on the measurement of physical sensations and on the law which links the intensity of these sensations to the intensity of the source. J. Plateau: report on 'Psychophysical study: theoretical and experimental research on the measurement.... Psychol Res. 1996; 59(2):136-44; discussion 134-6.
DOI: 10.1007/BF01792434.
View
7.
Maloney L, Knoblauch K
. Measuring and Modeling Visual Appearance. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2020; 6:519-537.
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-vision-030320-041152.
View
8.
Nagengast B, Marsh H, Scalas L, Xu M, Hau K, Trautwein U
. Who took the "x" out of expectancy-value theory? A psychological mystery, a substantive-methodological synergy, and a cross-national generalization. Psychol Sci. 2011; 22(8):1058-66.
DOI: 10.1177/0956797611415540.
View
9.
Bockenholt U
. Comparative judgments as an alternative to ratings: identifying the scale origin. Psychol Methods. 2004; 9(4):453-65.
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.453.
View
10.
Marks L, Borg G, Ljunggren G
. Individual differences in perceived exertion assessed by two new methods. Percept Psychophys. 1983; 34(3):280-8.
DOI: 10.3758/bf03202957.
View
11.
Russell J
. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol Rev. 2003; 110(1):145-72.
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145.
View
12.
Teghtsoonian R, Frost R
. The effects of viewing distance on fear of snakes. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1982; 13(3):181-90.
DOI: 10.1016/0005-7916(82)90002-7.
View
13.
Schimmack U, Bockenholt U, Reisenzein R
. Response styles in affect ratings: making a mountain out of a molehill. J Pers Assess. 2002; 78(3):461-83.
DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7803_06.
View
14.
Junge M, Reisenzein R
. Indirect scaling methods for testing quantitative emotion theories. Cogn Emot. 2013; 27(7):1247-75.
DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2013.782267.
View
15.
Michell , ERNST
. The Axioms of Quantity and the Theory of Measurement. J Math Psychol. 1996; 40(3):235-52.
DOI: 10.1006/jmps.1996.0023.
View
16.
Uher J
. Quantitative Data From Rating Scales: An Epistemological and Methodological Enquiry. Front Psychol. 2019; 9:2599.
PMC: 6308206.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02599.
View
17.
Bockenholt U
. Thurstonian-Based Analyses: Past, Present, and Future Utilities. Psychometrika. 2010; 71(4):615-629.
PMC: 2798976.
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-006-1598-5.
View
18.
Petrov A, Anderson J
. The dynamics of scaling: a memory-based anchor model of category rating and absolute identification. Psychol Rev. 2005; 112(2):383-416.
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.383.
View
19.
Westermann R
. Empirical test of scale type resulting from the Power Law for heaviness. Percept Mot Skills. 1982; 55(3 Pt 2):1167-73.
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1982.55.3f.1167.
View
20.
Garcia-Perez M, Alcala-Quintana R
. On the discrepant results in synchrony judgment and temporal-order judgment tasks: a quantitative model. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012; 19(5):820-46.
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0278-y.
View