» Articles » PMID: 39282005

Eye Tracking is More Sensitive Than Skin Conductance Response in Detecting Mild Environmental Stimuli

Overview
Journal PNAS Nexus
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Sep 16
PMID 39282005
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The skin conductance (SC) and eye tracking data are two potential arousal-related psychophysiological signals that can serve as the interoceptive unconditioned response to aversive stimuli (e.g. electric shocks). The current research investigates the sensitivity of these signals in detecting mild electric shock by decoding the hidden arousal and interoceptive awareness (IA) states. While well-established frameworks exist to decode the arousal state from the SC signal, there is a lack of a systematic approach that decodes the IA state from pupillometry and eye gaze measurements. We extract the physiological-based features from eye tracking data to recover the IA-related neural activity. Employing a Bayesian filtering framework, we decode the IA state in fear conditioning and extinction experiments where mild electric shock is used. We independently decode the underlying arousal state using binary and marked point process (MPP) observations derived from concurrently collected SC data. Eight of 11 subjects present a significantly (-value ) higher IA state in trials that were always accompanied by electric shock ( ) compared to trials that were never accompanied by electric shock ( ). According to the decoded SC-based arousal state, only five (binary observation) and four (MPP observation) subjects present a significantly higher arousal state in trials than trials. In conclusion, the decoded hidden brain state from eye tracking data better agrees with the presented mild stimuli. Tracking IA state from eye tracking data can lead to the development of contactless monitors for neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders.

References
1.
Wickramasuriya D, Faghih R . A Bayesian Filtering Approach for Tracking Arousal From Binary and Continuous Skin Conductance Features. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019; 67(6):1749-1760. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2945579. View

2.
Greco A, Valenza G, Lanata A, Scilingo E, Citi L . cvxEDA: A Convex Optimization Approach to Electrodermal Activity Processing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015; 63(4):797-804. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2474131. View

3.
Joshi S, Aupperle R, Khalsa S . Interoception in Fear Learning and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2023; 21(3):266-277. PMC: 10316209. DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.20230007. View

4.
Stuart S, Parrington L, Martini D, Popa B, Fino P, King L . Validation of a velocity-based algorithm to quantify saccades during walking and turning in mild traumatic brain injury and healthy controls. Physiol Meas. 2019; 40(4):044006. PMC: 7608620. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab159d. View

5.
Quigley K, Kanoski S, Grill W, Barrett L, Tsakiris M . Functions of Interoception: From Energy Regulation to Experience of the Self. Trends Neurosci. 2020; 44(1):29-38. PMC: 7780233. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.09.008. View