Experimental and Clinical Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Metal Artifact Correction Algorithm for Low-dose Following Up CT of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty

Overview

Journal Quant Imaging Med Surg

Specialty Radiology

Date 2024 Sep 16

PMID 39281161

Authors

Dan Zhu

Zhengjia Zhang

Yixuan Zou

Guozhi Zhang

Xiaofei Cheng

Daqian Wan

Songtao Ai

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Low-dose following up computed tomography (CT) of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) that involves the use of bone cement usually suffers from lightweight metal artifacts, where conventional techniques for CT metal artifact reduction are often not sufficiently effective. This study aimed to validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based metal artifact correction (MAC) algorithm for use in low-dose following up CT for PVP.

Methods: In experimental validation, an ovine vertebra phantom was designed to simulate the clinical scenario of PVP. With routine-dose images acquired prior to the cement introduction as the reference, low-dose CT scans were taken on the cemented phantom and processed with conventional MAC and AI-MAC. The resulting image quality was compared in CT attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), followed by a quantitative evaluation of the artifact correction accuracy based on adaptive segmentation of the paraspinal muscle. In clinical validation, ten cases of low-dose following up CT after PVP were enrolled to test the performance of diagnosing sarcopenia with measured CT attenuation per cemented vertebral segment, via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: With respect to the reference image, no significant difference was found for AI-MAC in CT attenuation, image noise, SNRs, and CNR (all P>0.05). The paraspinal muscle segmented on the AI-MAC image was 18.6% and 8.3% more complete to uncorrected and MAC images. Higher area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC analysis was found for AI-MAC (AUC =0.92) compared to the uncorrected (AUC =0.61) and MAC images (AUC =0.70).

Conclusions: In low-dose following up CT for PVP, the AI-MAC has been fully validated for its superior ability compared to conventional MAC in suppressing artifacts and may be a reliable alternative for diagnosing sarcopenia.

References

Peterson S, Braunschweig C . Prevalence of Sarcopenia and Associated Outcomes in the Clinical Setting. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015; 31(1):40-8. DOI: 10.1177/0884533615622537. View

Shafaat O, Liu Y, Jackson K, Motter J, Boyarsky B, Latif M . Association between Abdominal CT Measurements of Body Composition before Deceased Donor Liver Transplant with Posttransplant Outcomes. Radiology. 2022; 306(3):e212403. PMC: 9968774. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.212403. View

Zhou X, Meng X, Zhu H, Zhu Y, Yuan W . Early versus late percutaneous kyphoplasty for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A retrospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019; 180:101-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.03.029. View

Li X, Wu B, Zou Y, Zhang G, Liu S, Zhao L . Development of a 3D-printed pelvic CT phantom combined with fresh pathological tissues of bone tumor. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022; 12(9):4647-4657. PMC: 9403588. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-147. View

Libicher M, Vetter M, Wolf I, Noeldge G, Kasperk C, Grafe I . CT volumetry of intravertebral cement after kyphoplasty. Comparison of polymethylmethacrylate and calcium phosphate in a 12-month follow-up. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15(8):1544-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2709-x. View

Griffoni C, Lukassen J, Babbi L, Girolami M, Lamartina C, Cecchinato R . Percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a prospective randomized comparison. Eur Spine J. 2020; 29(7):1614-1620. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06434-3. View

Paik J, Rosen H, Katz J, Rosner B, Rimm E, Gordon C . BMI, Waist Circumference, and Risk of Incident Vertebral Fracture in Women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019; 27(9):1513-1519. PMC: 6707901. DOI: 10.1002/oby.22555. View

Koitka S, Kroll L, Malamutmann E, Oezcelik A, Nensa F . Fully automated body composition analysis in routine CT imaging using 3D semantic segmentation convolutional neural networks. Eur Radiol. 2020; 31(4):1795-1804. PMC: 7979624. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07147-3. View

Wang W, Lin C, Xie C, Liu H, Zhu M, Huang K . The association between sarcopenia and osteoporotic vertebral compression refractures. Osteoporos Int. 2019; 30(12):2459-2467. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05144-x. View

10.

Grandmougin A, Bakour O, Villani N, Baumann C, Rousseau H, Gondim Teixeira P . Metal artifact reduction for small metal implants on CT: Which image reconstruction algorithm performs better?. Eur J Radiol. 2020; 127:108970. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108970. View

11.

Ida S, Kaneko R, Murata K . SARC-F for Screening of Sarcopenia Among Older Adults: A Meta-analysis of Screening Test Accuracy. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018; 19(8):685-689. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.04.001. View

12.

Abdelgawaad A, Ezzati A, Govindasamy R, Krajnovic B, Elnady B, Said G . Kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures with posterior wall injury. Spine J. 2017; 18(7):1143-1148. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.001. View

13.

Huang C, Tseng I, Yang S, Lin Y, Chan W . Lumbar muscle volume in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic compression fractures: quantitative measurement using MRI. Eur Radiol. 2019; 29(9):4999-5006. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06034-w. View

14.

Albano D, Messina C, Vitale J, Sconfienza L . Imaging of sarcopenia: old evidence and new insights. Eur Radiol. 2019; 30(4):2199-2208. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06573-2. View

15.

Wei Z, Weng X . Intracardiac and intrapulmonary cement embolisms after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(12):8850-8852. PMC: 10722014. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-606. View

16.

Lainez Ramos-Bossini A, Lopez Zuniga D, Ruiz Santiago F . Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment and placebo in osteoporotic vertebral fractures: meta-analysis and critical review of the literature. Eur Radiol. 2021; 31(11):8542-8553. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08018-1. View

17.

Zopfs D, Theurich S, Grosse Hokamp N, Knuever J, Gerecht L, Borggrefe J . Single-slice CT measurements allow for accurate assessment of sarcopenia and body composition. Eur Radiol. 2019; 30(3):1701-1708. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06526-9. View

18.

Kuchenbecker S, Faby S, Sawall S, Lell M, Kachelriess M . Dual energy CT: how well can pseudo-monochromatic imaging reduce metal artifacts?. Med Phys. 2015; 42(2):1023-36. DOI: 10.1118/1.4905106. View

19.

Tagliafico A, Bignotti B, Torri L, Rossi F . Sarcopenia: how to measure, when and why. Radiol Med. 2022; 127(3):228-237. PMC: 8960583. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01450-3. View

20.

Malmstrom T, Miller D, Simonsick E, Ferrucci L, Morley J . SARC-F: a symptom score to predict persons with sarcopenia at risk for poor functional outcomes. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016; 7(1):28-36. PMC: 4799853. DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12048. View