» Articles » PMID: 39280636

Thromboelastography in Long-Term Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients Diagnosed with Benign Prostate Hyperplasia Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Retrospective Study

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2024 Sep 16
PMID 39280636
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare low- vs high-power HoLEP effects on coagulation in patients on antiplatelet (AP) therapy via thromboelastography (TEG).

Methods: 210 patients was retrospectively analyzed and stratificated into three discrete groups, specifically: Group A (AP therapy, high-power HoLEP, n = 72); Group B (AP therapy, low-power HoLEP, n=73); Group C (no AP therapy, low-power HoLEP, n = 65). Baseline characteristics and coagulation profiles via TEG were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors associated with hematuria. Furthermore, parameters such as IPSS, Qmax, post-void residual volume V and PSA levels were recorded during 1year follow-up.

Results: No differences in terms of baseline characteristics across all groups. Significant differences were observed in the duration of enucleation, morcellation, bladder irrigation, post-operative catheterization, length of hospital stay and the extent of hemoglobin reduction (F = 54.06, 8.54, 6.68, 9.24, 17.06, 5.97, p < 0.05). No differences were noted in postoperative hematuria, urine retention, transfusion rates, and SUI (x = 1.082 ; x  = 0.197,; x = 3.981;x  = 0.816, p > 0.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that prostate volume emerged as an independent risk factor for hematuria (OR 1.080, 95% CI: 1.007-1.158, p = 0.031). Clinical outcomes including Qmax, IPSS, V, and PSA demonstrated significant enhancement during 1 year follow-up.

Conclusion: Compared to HP-HoLEP, LP-HoLEP effectively reduces surgical and subsequent processing times, decreases hospital stay duration, and diminishes hemoglobin decline, offering a viable option without discontinuing AP therapy.

References
1.
Hartmann J, Curzen N . Modified Thromboelastography for Peri-interventional Assessment of Platelet Function in Cardiology Patients: A Narrative Review. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2022; 49(2):192-200. PMC: 9894686. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757545. View

2.
Teichman A, Cotton B, Byrne J, Dhillon N, Berndtson A, Price M . Approaches for optimizing venous thromboembolism prevention in injured patients: Findings from the consensus conference to implement optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023; 94(3):469-478. PMC: 9975027. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003854. View

3.
Boeri L, Capogrosso P, Ventimiglia E, Fontana M, Sampogna G, Zanetti S . Clinical Comparison of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate and Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate in Patients Under Either Anticoagulation or Antiplatelet Therapy. Eur Urol Focus. 2019; 6(4):720-728. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.03.002. View

4.
Mukhopadhyay T, Subramanian A . An overview of the potential sources of diagnostic errors in (classic) thromboelastography curve interpretation and preventive measures. Pract Lab Med. 2020; 22:e00193. PMC: 7723805. DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00193. View

5.
Shah H, Etafy M, Katz J, Garcia Lopez E, Shah R . A randomized controlled trial comparing high and medium power settings for holmium laser enucleation of prostate. World J Urol. 2021; 39(8):3005-3011. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03535-y. View