» Articles » PMID: 39280330

In Humans, Insulo-striate Structural Connectivity is Largely Biased Toward Either Striosome-like or Matrix-like Striatal Compartments

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Sep 16
PMID 39280330
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The insula is an integral component of sensory, motor, limbic, and executive functions, and insular dysfunction is associated with numerous human neuropsychiatric disorders. Insular efferents project widely, but insulo-striate projections are especially numerous. The targets of these insulo-striate projections are organized into tissue compartments, the striosome and matrix. These striatal compartments have distinct embryologic origins, afferent and efferent connectivity, dopamine pharmacology, and susceptibility to injury. Striosome and matrix appear to occupy separate sets of cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical loops, so a bias in insulo-striate projections toward one compartment may also embed an insular subregion in distinct regulatory and functional networks. Compartment-specific mapping of insulo-striate structural connectivity is sparse; the insular subregions are largely unmapped for compartment-specific projections. In 100 healthy adults, diffusion tractography was utilized to map and quantify structural connectivity between 19 structurally-defined insular subregions and each striatal compartment. Insulo-striate streamlines that reached striosome-like and matrix-like voxels were concentrated in distinct insular zones (striosome: rostro- and caudoventral; matrix: caudodorsal) and followed different paths to reach the striatum. Though tractography was generated independently in each hemisphere, the spatial distribution and relative bias of striosome-like and matrix-like streamlines were highly similar in the left and right insula. 16 insular subregions were significantly biased toward 1 compartment: 7 toward striosome-like voxels and 9 toward matrix-like voxels. Striosome-favoring bundles had significantly higher streamline density, especially from rostroventral insular subregions. The biases in insulo-striate structural connectivity that were identified mirrored the compartment-specific biases identified in prior studies that utilized injected tract tracers, cytoarchitecture, or functional MRI. Segregating insulo-striate structural connectivity through either striosome or matrix may be an anatomic substrate for functional specialization among the insular subregions.

Citing Articles

The striatal matrix compartment is expanded in autism spectrum disorder.

Waugh J, Hassan A, Funk A, Maldjian J J Neurodev Disord. 2025; 17(1):8.

PMID: 39955485 PMC: 11829417. DOI: 10.1186/s11689-025-09596-7.


The striatal compartments, striosome and matrix, are embedded in largely distinct resting state functional networks.

Sadiq A, Funk A, Waugh J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39763746 PMC: 11702670. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.13.628392.

References
1.
Haber S, Kunishio K, Mizobuchi M, Lynd-Balta E . The orbital and medial prefrontal circuit through the primate basal ganglia. J Neurosci. 1995; 15(7 Pt 1):4851-67. PMC: 6577885. View

2.
Mazzola L, Isnard J, Peyron R, Guenot M, Mauguiere F . Somatotopic organization of pain responses to direct electrical stimulation of the human insular cortex. Pain. 2009; 146(1-2):99-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.07.014. View

3.
Mikula S, Parrish S, Trimmer J, Jones E . Complete 3D visualization of primate striosomes by KChIP1 immunostaining. J Comp Neurol. 2009; 514(5):507-17. PMC: 2737266. DOI: 10.1002/cne.22051. View

4.
Jezzini A, Rozzi S, Borra E, Gallese V, Caruana F, Gerbella M . A shared neural network for emotional expression and perception: an anatomical study in the macaque monkey. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015; 9:243. PMC: 4585325. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00243. View

5.
Peinemann A, Schuller S, Pohl C, Jahn T, Weindl A, Kassubek J . Executive dysfunction in early stages of Huntington's disease is associated with striatal and insular atrophy: a neuropsychological and voxel-based morphometric study. J Neurol Sci. 2005; 239(1):11-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2005.07.007. View