» Articles » PMID: 39280125

PTCOG International Survey of Practice Patterns and Trends in Utilization of Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer

Abstract

Purpose/objectives: The indications, techniques, and extent to which proton beam therapy (PBT) is employed for breast cancer are unknown. We seek to determine PBT utilization for breast cancer.

Materials/methods: The Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group (PTCOG) Breast Subcommittee developed an IRB-approved 29-question survey and sent it to breast cancer radiation oncologists at all active PBT centers worldwide in June 2023. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses, and comparisons by continent were performed using Fisher's exact tests.

Results: Of 79 surveys distributed, 28 recipients submitted responses (35 % response rate) representing fifteen U.S., 8 European, and 5 Asian centers (continent response rate 50 %, 38 %, and 18 %, respectively). Overall, 93 % reported treating breast cancer patients with PBT; 13 (50 %) have treated ≥100 breast cancer patients at their center since opening. Most (89 %) have pencil beam scanning technology. Nearly half (46 %) use moderate hypofractionation (15-20 fractions) for regional nodal irradiation and 42 % conventional fractionation (25-30 fractions). More European centers prefer hypofractionation (88 %) vs. Asian (50 %) and U.S. (21 %) centers (p = 0.003). Common patient selection methods were practitioner determination/patient preference (n = 16) and comparative plan evaluation (n = 15). U.S. centers reported the most experience with breast PBT, with 71 % having treated ≥100 breast cancer patients vs. 38 % in Europe and none in Asia (p = 0.001). Of respondent centers, 39 % enrolled ≥75 % of breast PBT patients on a research study.

Conclusion: Utilization, patient selection methods, and dose-fractionation approaches for breast cancer PBT vary worldwide. These survey data serve as a benchmark from which successor surveys can provide insight on practice pattern evolution.

Citing Articles

Utilizing proton therapy to reduce health-care disparities among patients with breast cancers.

Hsieh K, Choi J, Nehlsen A, Fox J, Bakst R, Bloom J JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2025; 9(1).

PMID: 39996603 PMC: 11851469. DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaf003.

References
1.
Boersma L, Sattler M, Maduro J, Bijker N, Essers M, van Gestel C . Model-Based Selection for Proton Therapy in Breast Cancer: Development of the National Indication Protocol for Proton Therapy and First Clinical Experiences. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2022; 34(4):247-257. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.12.007. View

2.
MacDonald S, Patel S, Hickey S, Specht M, Isakoff S, Gadd M . Proton therapy for breast cancer after mastectomy: early outcomes of a prospective clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 86(3):484-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.01.038. View

3.
Stick L, Lorenzen E, Yates E, Anandadas C, Andersen K, Aristei C . Selection criteria for early breast cancer patients in the DBCG proton trial - The randomised phase III trial strategy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2021; 27:126-131. PMC: 7892790. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.012. View

4.
Holt F, Probert J, Darby S, Haviland J, Coles C, Kirby A . Proton Beam Therapy for Early Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023; 117(4):869-882. PMC: 7615202. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.02.023. View

5.
Ranger A, Dunlop A, Hutchinson K, Convery H, Maclennan M, Chantler H . A Dosimetric Comparison of Breast Radiotherapy Techniques to Treat Locoregional Lymph Nodes Including the Internal Mammary Chain. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2018; 30(6):346-353. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.01.017. View