» Articles » PMID: 39276329

Backyard Running: Pushing the Boundaries of Human Performance

Overview
Journal Eur J Sport Sci
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2024 Sep 14
PMID 39276329
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ultrarunning is gaining in popularity but no information is available on the physiological and psychological responses during backyard ultrarunning events. The aim of this study was to determine changes in cognitive function, markers of physiological resilience, and running performance during a backyard-running event. Twelve male ultrarunners (38 ± 8 years old, BMI: 23.5 ± 1.6 kg/m, and VO: 60.8 ± 4.7 mL/min/kg) were monitored before, during, and after the event. Cognitive performance was determined using a cognitive test battery before, during, and after the event. During the event, the rating of perceived exertion (RPE), blood lactate concentration, and heart rate (HR) were assessed. Physical performance was investigated using the total number of completed laps and running speed per lap. Athletes completed 34 ± 17 laps equaling 227.8 ± 113.9 km with average speeds starting at 9.0 km/h and slowing down to 7.5 km/h at the end of the event. Physiological resilience (estimated using HR/speed) varied between athletes, with significantly lower values in the more proficient backyard runners at the end of the event (p < 0.05). HR and lactate levels remained constant, whereas a progressive increase in RPE was noticed (p ≤ 0.001). A significantly worsened reaction time was observed for several cognitive tasks after the event compared to baseline measures (p ≤ 0.05). These observations show that physiological resilience differs depending on the level of endurance performance of the athletes. Furthermore, the backyard ultrarunning event negatively impacted psychomotor speed. Therefore, the results suggest that implementing strategies that enhance physiological resilience and/or psychomotor speed could potentially have a positive effect on performance in ultraendurance activities.

References
1.
Santos-Concejero J, Billaut F, Grobler L, Olivan J, Noakes T, Tucker R . Maintained cerebral oxygenation during maximal self-paced exercise in elite Kenyan runners. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014; 118(2):156-62. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00909.2014. View

2.
Garbisu-Hualde A, Santos-Concejero J . What are the Limiting Factors During an Ultra-Marathon? A Systematic Review of the Scientific Literature. J Hum Kinet. 2020; 72:129-139. PMC: 7126261. DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0102. View

3.
Proost M, Habay J, De Wachter J, De Pauw K, Rattray B, Meeusen R . How to Tackle Mental Fatigue: A Systematic Review of Potential Countermeasures and Their Underlying Mechanisms. Sports Med. 2022; 52(9):2129-2158. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-022-01678-z. View

4.
Smyth B, Maunder E, Meyler S, Hunter B, Muniz-Pumares D . Decoupling of Internal and External Workload During a Marathon: An Analysis of Durability in 82,303 Recreational Runners. Sports Med. 2022; 52(9):2283-2295. PMC: 9388405. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-022-01680-5. View

5.
Denadai B, Greco C . Could middle- and long-distance running performance of well-trained athletes be best predicted by the same aerobic parameters?. Curr Res Physiol. 2022; 5:265-269. PMC: 9253837. DOI: 10.1016/j.crphys.2022.06.006. View