» Articles » PMID: 39273744

Robotics in Physical Rehabilitation: Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Sep 14
PMID 39273744
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As the global prevalence of motor disabilities continues to rise, there is a pressing need for advanced solutions in physical rehabilitation. This systematic review examines the progress and challenges of implementing robotic technologies in the motor rehabilitation of patients with physical disabilities. The integration of robotic technologies such as exoskeletons, assistive training devices, and brain-computer interface systems holds significant promise for enhancing functional recovery and patient autonomy. The review synthesizes findings from the most important studies, focusing on the clinical effectiveness of robotic interventions in comparison to traditional rehabilitation methods. The analysis reveals that robotic therapies can significantly improve motor function, strength, co-ordination, and dexterity. Robotic systems also support neuroplasticity, enabling patients to relearn lost motor skills through precise, controlled, and repetitive exercises. However, the adoption of these technologies is hindered by high costs, the need for specialized training, and limited accessibility. Key insights from the review highlight the necessity of personalizing robotic therapies to meet individual patient needs, alongside addressing technical, economic, social, and cultural barriers. The review also underscores the importance of continued research to optimize these technologies and develop effective implementation strategies. By overcoming these challenges, robotic technologies can revolutionize motor rehabilitation, improving quality of life and social integration for individuals with motor disabilities.

Citing Articles

Shoulder Musculoskeletal Disorder Rehabilitation Using a Robotic Device Based on Electromyography (EMG) Biofeedback: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Lavalliere M, Tremblay M, Ojardias E, Turpin M, Perrochon A, Rigoard P Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(2).

PMID: 40005389 PMC: 11857678. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61020272.

References
1.
Carpinella I, Lencioni T, Bowman T, Bertoni R, Turolla A, Ferrarin M . Effects of robot therapy on upper body kinematics and arm function in persons post stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020; 17(1):10. PMC: 6990497. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-0646-1. View

2.
Bressi F, Campagnola B, Cricenti L, Santacaterina F, Miccinilli S, Pino G . Upper limb home-based robotic rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients: A pilot study. Front Neurorobot. 2023; 17:1130770. PMC: 10061073. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2023.1130770. View

3.
Volpe B, Krebs H, Hogan N, Edelstein OTR L, Diels C, Aisen M . A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology. 2000; 54(10):1938-44. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.54.10.1938. View

4.
Park J, Shin Y, You J, Park M . Comparative effects of robotic-assisted gait training combined with conventional physical therapy on paretic hip joint stiffness and kinematics between subacute and chronic hemiparetic stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2018; 42(2):181-190. DOI: 10.3233/NRE-172234. View

5.
Johansen T, Sorensen L, Kolskar K, Strom V, Wouda M . Effectiveness of robot-assisted arm exercise on arm and hand function in stroke survivors - A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2023; 10:20556683231183639. PMC: 10327418. DOI: 10.1177/20556683231183639. View