» Articles » PMID: 39272906

Thermosensitive Liposomes for Gemcitabine Delivery to Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Sep 14
PMID 39272906
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with gemcitabine is limited by an increased desmoplasia, poor vascularization, and short plasma half-life. Heat-sensitive liposomes modified by polyethylene glycol (PEG; PEGylated liposomes) can increase plasma stability, reduce clearance, and decrease side effects. Nevertheless, translation of heat-sensitive liposomes to the clinic has been hindered by the low loading efficiency of gemcitabine and by the difficulty of inducing hyperthermia in vivo. This study was designed to investigate the effect of phospholipid content on the stability of liposomes at 37 °C and their release under hyperthermia conditions; this was accomplished by employing a two-stage heating approach. First the liposomes were heated at a fast rate, then they were transferred to a holding bath. Thermosensitive liposomes formulated with DPPC: DSPC: PEG2k (80:15:5, mole%) exhibited minimal release of carboxyfluorescein at 37 °C over 30 min, indicating stability under physiological conditions. However, upon exposure to hyperthermic conditions (43 °C and 45 °C), these liposomes demonstrated a rapid and significant release of their encapsulated content. The encapsulation efficiency for gemcitabine was calculated at 16.9%. Additionally, fluorescent analysis during the removal of unencapsulated gemcitabine revealed an increase in pH. In vitro tests with BxPC3 and KPC cell models showed that these thermosensitive liposomes induced a heat-dependent cytotoxic effect comparable to free gemcitabine at temperatures above 41 °C. This study highlights the effectiveness of the heating mechanism and cell models in understanding the current challenges in developing gemcitabine-loaded heat-sensitive liposomes.

Citing Articles

Metal Complexation for the Rational Design of Gemcitabine Formulations in Cancer Therapy.

Carnamucio F, Foti C, Cordaro M, Saija F, Cassone G, da Rocha S ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024; 16(42):56789-56800.

PMID: 39378358 PMC: 11503523. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.4c12550.

References
1.
Kong G, Braun R, Dewhirst M . Characterization of the effect of hyperthermia on nanoparticle extravasation from tumor vasculature. Cancer Res. 2001; 61(7):3027-32. View

2.
Barreto S, Shukla P, Shrikhande S . Tumors of the Pancreatic Body and Tail. World J Oncol. 2017; 1(2):52-65. PMC: 5649906. DOI: 10.4021/wjon2010.04.200w. View

3.
Tataranni T, Agriesti F, Ruggieri V, Mazzoccoli C, Simeon V, Laurenzana I . Rewiring carbohydrate catabolism differentially affects survival of pancreatic cancer cell lines with diverse metabolic profiles. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(25):41265-41281. PMC: 5522241. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17172. View

4.
Tucci S, Kheirolomoom A, Ingham E, Mahakian L, Tam S, Foiret J . Tumor-specific delivery of gemcitabine with activatable liposomes. J Control Release. 2019; 309:277-288. PMC: 6815719. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.07.014. View

5.
Lombardo D, Kiselev M . Methods of Liposomes Preparation: Formation and Control Factors of Versatile Nanocarriers for Biomedical and Nanomedicine Application. Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(3). PMC: 8955843. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030543. View