» Articles » PMID: 39272166

Anti-protein Phosphatase Magnesium-dependent 1A-IgM Levels in Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: a Potential Biomarker

Overview
Journal Adv Rheumatol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2024 Sep 13
PMID 39272166
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has been known to have auto-inflammatory nature; hence, the efficacy of autoantibodies is low. However, studies on autoantibodies are ongoing, with some studies showing associations. Previous studies showed that anti-protein phosphatase magnesium-dependent 1A (PPM1A) IgG was increased in patients with AS and associated with radiographic progression. However, the diagnostic usefulness was limited due to relatively low sensitivity and specificity. This pilot study evaluated the diagnostic utility of anti-PPM1A-IgM and anti-PPM1A-IgG in patients with active AS.

Methods: Serum samples were obtained from the registry cohort of a single tertiary center in Korea. Serum levels of anti-PPM1A-IgG/IgM were measured by direct ELISA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to predict the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of serum anti-PPM1A-IgG/IgM.

Results: Samples were collected from 28 patients with active AS, 16 healthy controls (HCs), and 28 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although total serum IgM was lower in the RA and AS groups than in the HC group, anti-PPM1A-IgM was significantly lower in the AS group than in the other groups. In evaluating the diagnostic utility of anti-PPM1A-IgG/IgM for AS patients compared with HCs, the area under the curve (AUC) of anti-PPM1A-IgM was 0.998 (sensitivity 96.4%, specificity 100.0%). When ROC analysis of anti-PPM1A-IgM for AS patients compared with RA patients was conducted, sensitivity was 78.6% and specificity was 71.4%, with an AUC of 0.839.

Conclusion: Decreased anti-PPM1A-IgM levels in AS patients suggests a potential role for anti-PPM1A-IgM in the diagnosis of active AS.

References
1.
Gratacos J, Collado A, Pons F, Osaba M, Sanmarti R, Roque M . Significant loss of bone mass in patients with early, active ankylosing spondylitis: a followup study. Arthritis Rheum. 1999; 42(11):2319-24. DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(199911)42:11<2319::AID-ANR9>3.0.CO;2-G. View

2.
Braun J, Sieper J . Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet. 2007; 369(9570):1379-1390. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60635-7. View

3.
Rudwaleit M, Listing J, Brandt J, Braun J, Sieper J . Prediction of a major clinical response (BASDAI 50) to tumour necrosis factor alpha blockers in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004; 63(6):665-70. PMC: 1755042. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2003.016386. View

4.
Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, Zink A, Alten R, Golder W . Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Lancet. 2002; 359(9313):1187-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08215-6. View

5.
van der Heijde D, Dijkmans B, Geusens P, Sieper J, DeWoody K, Williamson P . Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ASSERT). Arthritis Rheum. 2005; 52(2):582-91. DOI: 10.1002/art.20852. View