» Articles » PMID: 39267410

Timing of Sodium-glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Initiation and Post-discharge Outcomes in Acute Heart Failure with Diabetes: A Population-based Cohort Study

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2024 Sep 13
PMID 39267410
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Results from randomized trials suggest benefit of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor initiation in clinically stable acute heart failure. We aim to examine the real-world effectiveness of early versus delayed post-discharge SGLT2 inhibitor initiation in people with acute heart failure and type 2 diabetes.

Methods And Results: Using linkable administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, individuals aged 66 years or older with type 2 diabetes who were discharged to the community from acute care hospitals for heart failure between 1 July 2016 and 31 March 2020 were included in this retrospective, population-based cohort study. The primary outcome was hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or cardiovascular mortality as a composite. Follow-up started from discharge for maximum 1 year. We compared outcomes between post-discharge SGLT2 inhibitor initiation within 3 days, 4-90 days, or 91-180 days, versus delayed initiation for at least 180 days. The 'clone-censor-weight' approach with a target trial emulation framework was used to address time-related biases. There were 9641 eligible individuals. After cloning and artificial censoring, there were 38 564 clones, 12 439 person-years, and 7584 events. Compared to delayed initiation for at least 180 days, initiation within 3 days post-discharge was associated with a lower 1-year risk of HHF or cardiovascular mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.83), while initiation 4-90 days (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.93) or 91-180 days (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79-0.97) showed smaller risk reduction.

Conclusion: Real-world evidence supports early SGLT2 inhibitor initiation to reduce HHF or cardiovascular mortality in acute heart failure and type 2 diabetes.

References
1.
Urbich M, Globe G, Pantiri K, Heisen M, Bennison C, Wirtz H . A Systematic Review of Medical Costs Associated with Heart Failure in the USA (2014-2020). Pharmacoeconomics. 2020; 38(11):1219-1236. PMC: 7546989. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00952-0. View

2.
Pitt B, Bhatt D, Szarek M, Cannon C, Leiter L, McGuire D . Effect of Sotagliflozin on Early Mortality and Heart Failure-Related Events: A Post Hoc Analysis of SOLOIST-WHF. JACC Heart Fail. 2023; 11(8 Pt 1):879-889. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.05.026. View

3.
Hernan M . How to estimate the effect of treatment duration on survival outcomes using observational data. BMJ. 2018; 360:k182. PMC: 6889975. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k182. View

4.
Damman K, Beusekamp J, Boorsma E, Swart H, Smilde T, Elvan A . Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre pilot study on the effects of empagliflozin on clinical outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (EMPA-RESPONSE-AHF). Eur J Heart Fail. 2020; 22(4):713-722. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1713. View

5.
Hernan M, Robins J . Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available. Am J Epidemiol. 2016; 183(8):758-64. PMC: 4832051. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwv254. View