» Articles » PMID: 39266316

Multinational Trends in Sepsis Mortality Between 1985 and 2019: a Temporal Analysis of the WHO Mortality Database

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Sep 12
PMID 39266316
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Understanding the burden of disease of sepsis is essential for monitoring the effectiveness of international strategies to improve sepsis care. Our objective was to describe the multinational trend of sepsis-related mortality for the period 1985-2019 from the WHO Mortality Database.

Design: Retrospective analysis of the WHO Mortality Database.

Setting: We included data from all countries defined by the WHO as having 'high usability data' and at least 10 years of total available data.

Participants: From the WHO list of 50 countries with high usability data, 14 (28%) were excluded due to excessive missingness. We included and analysed data separately for male and female.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: We analysed age-standardised mortality rates (ASMR) (weighted average of the age-specific mortality rates per 100 000 people, where the weights are the proportions of people in the corresponding age groups of the WHO standard population).

Results: We included 1104 country-years worth of data from 36 countries with high usability data, accounting for around 15% of the world's population. The median ASMR for men decreased from 37.8 deaths/100 000 (IQR 28.4-46.7) in 1985-1987 to 25.8 deaths/100 000 (IQR 19.2-37) in 2017-2019, an approximately 12% absolute (31.8% relative) decrease. For women, the overall ASMR decreased from 22.9 deaths/100 000 (IQR 17.7-32.2) to 16.2 deaths/100 000 (IQR 12.6-21.6), an approximately 6.7% absolute decrease (29.3% relative decrease). The analysis of country-level data revealed wide variations in estimates and trends.

Conclusions: We observed a decrease in reported sepsis-related mortality across the majority of analysed nations between 1985 and 2019. However, significant variability remains between gender and health systems. System-level and population-level factors may contribute to these differences, and additional investigations are necessary to further explain these trends.

Citing Articles

Machine Learning Models in Sepsis Outcome Prediction for ICU Patients: Integrating Routine Laboratory Tests-A Systematic Review.

Musat F, Paduraru D, Bolocan A, Palcau C, Copaceanu A, Ion D Biomedicines. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39767798 PMC: 11727033. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122892.

References
1.
Fleischmann-Struzek C, Thomas-Ruddel D, Schettler A, Schwarzkopf D, Stacke A, Seymour C . Comparing the validity of different ICD coding abstraction strategies for sepsis case identification in German claims data. PLoS One. 2018; 13(7):e0198847. PMC: 6066203. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198847. View

2.
Kempker J, Martin G . A global accounting of sepsis. Lancet. 2020; 395(10219):168-170. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33065-X. View

3.
Marshall D, Salciccioli J, Shea B, Akuthota P . Trends in mortality from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the European Union: an observational study of the WHO mortality database from 2001-2013. Eur Respir J. 2018; 51(1). DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01603-2017. View

4.
Kim H, Fay M, Feuer E, Midthune D . Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med. 2000; 19(3):335-51. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<335::aid-sim336>3.0.co;2-z. View

5.
Shankar-Hari M, Harrison D, Rubenfeld G, Rowan K . Epidemiology of sepsis and septic shock in critical care units: comparison between sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 populations using a national critical care database. Br J Anaesth. 2017; 119(4):626-636. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex234. View