» Articles » PMID: 39261378

Efficacy of Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine After Lung Transplantation: an Updated Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2024 Sep 11
PMID 39261378
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Little data supports using tacrolimus versus cyclosporin for immunosuppression concerning acute rejection and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome/Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction CLAD complications following lung transplantation (LTx). Our goal was to evaluate the use of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in preventing these complications after LTx.

Methods: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by searching PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through January 10th, 2024. We pooled dichotomous data using the risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using the mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: We included Four RCTs with a total of 677 patients. Tacrolimus was significantly associated with decreased risk of acute rejection (RR: 1.21, 95% CI [1.03, 1.42], I = 25%, P = 0.02) compared with cyclosporine, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome/CLAD (RR: 1.87, 95% CI [1.26, 2.77], I = 52%, P = 0.002), and treatment withdrawal (RR: 3.11, 95% CI [2.06, 4.70], I = 0%, P =  < 0.00001). However, tacrolimus significantly increased the risk of new-onset diabetes (RR: 0.33, 95% CI [0.12, 0.91], I = 0%, P = 0.03), and kidney dysfunction (RR: 0.79, 95% CI [0.66, 0.93], I = 0%, P = 0.006). In contrast, there was no difference in the incidence of all-cause mortality (RR: 91, 95% CI [0.68, 1.22], I = 0%, P = 0.53), arterial hypertension (RR: 2.40, 95% CI [0.41, 14.21], I = 92%, P = 0.33), and new cancer (RR: 1.57, 95% CI [0.79, 3.10], I = 4%, P = 0.20).

Conclusion: Tacrolimus has decreased acute rejection episodes and CLAD rate than cyclosporine, but it increased the risk of new-onset diabetes and kidney dysfunction.

References
1.
Colombo D, Ammirati E . Cyclosporine in transplantation - a history of converging timelines. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2012; 25(4):493-504. View

2.
Bennett D, Fossi A, Marchetti L, Lanzarone N, Sisi S, Refini R . Postoperative acute kidney injury in lung transplant recipients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019; 28(6):929-935. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivy355. View

3.
Penninga L, Moller C, Gustafsson F, Gluud C, Steinbruchel D . Immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction for heart transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (12):CD008842. PMC: 11559623. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008842.pub2. View

4.
Naci H, Davis C, Savovic J, Higgins J, Sterne J, Gyawali B . Design characteristics, risk of bias, and reporting of randomised controlled trials supporting approvals of cancer drugs by European Medicines Agency, 2014-16: cross sectional analysis. BMJ. 2019; 366:l5221. PMC: 6749182. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l5221. View

5.
Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, Vist G, Falck-Ytter Y, Schunemann H . What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?. BMJ. 2008; 336(7651):995-8. PMC: 2364804. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE. View