» Articles » PMID: 39261352

The Cervico-ocular Reflex Changes Following Treatment in Individuals with Subclinical Neck Pain: a Randomized Control Trial

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Sep 11
PMID 39261352
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Individuals with subclinical neck pain (SCNP) exhibit altered cerebellar processing, likely due to disordered sensorimotor integration of inaccurate proprioceptive input. This association between proprioceptive feedback and SMI has been captured in cervico-ocular reflex (COR) differences where SCNP showed higher gain than healthy participants. Previous neurophysiological research demonstrated improved cerebellar processing in SCNP participants following a single treatment session, but it is unknown whether these neurophysiological changes transfer to cerebellar function. In a parallel group, randomized control trial conducted at Ontario Tech University, 27 right-hand dominant SCNP participants were allocated to the 8-week chiropractic care (n = 15; 7M & 8 F) or 8-week control (n = 12; 6M & 6 F) group. COR gain (ratio of eye movement to trunk movement) was assessed using an eye-tracking device at baseline and at post 8-weeks (treatment vs. no treatment). COR gain (10 trials): participants gazed at a circular target that disappeared after 3 s, while a motorized chair rotated their trunk at a frequency of 0.04 Hz, with an amplitude of 5º, for 2 minutes. A 2 × 2 repeated measures ANOVA was performed. COR gain was significantly reduced following 8-weeks of chiropractic care compared to the SCNP control (8-weeks of no treatment) group (p = 0.012, η = 0.237). The decrease in COR gain following treatment is likely due to normalized proprioceptive feedback from the neck, enabling improved processing and integration within the flocculonodular lobe of the cerebellum.

Citing Articles

Neuromuscular Response to High-Velocity, Low-Amplitude Spinal Manipulation-An Overview.

Alanazi M, Degenhardt B, Kelley-Franklin G, Cox J, Lipke L, Reed W Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(2).

PMID: 40005304 PMC: 11857552. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61020187.

References
1.
Arieh H, Abdoli B, Farsi A, Haghparast A . Pain-induced Impact on Movement: Motor Coordination Variability and Accuracy-based Skill. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2022; 13(3):421-431. PMC: 9706296. DOI: 10.32598/bcn.2021.2930.1. View

2.
Bababekova Y, Rosenfield M, Hue J, Huang R . Font size and viewing distance of handheld smart phones. Optom Vis Sci. 2011; 88(7):795-7. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182198792. View

3.
Bakker D, Richmond F, ABRAHAMS V . Central projections from cat suboccipital muscles: a study using transganglionic transport of horseradish peroxidase. J Comp Neurol. 1984; 228(3):409-21. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902280308. View

4.
Belton T, McCrea R . Contribution of the cerebellar flocculus to gaze control during active head movements. J Neurophysiol. 1999; 81(6):3105-9. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.6.3105. View

5.
Berolo S, Wells R, Amick 3rd B . Musculoskeletal symptoms among mobile hand-held device users and their relationship to device use: A preliminary study in a Canadian university population. Appl Ergon. 2010; 42(2):371-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.010. View