Safety Signals Reinforce Instrumental Avoidance in Humans

Overview

Journal Learn Mem

Specialty Neurology

Date 2024 Sep 11

PMID 39260876

Authors

Courteney T L Fisher

Gonzalo P Urcelay

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Safety signals reinforce instrumental avoidance behavior in nonhuman animals. However, there are no conclusive demonstrations of this phenomenon in humans. Using human participants in an avoidance task, Experiments 1-3 and 5 were conducted online to assess the reinforcing properties of safety signals, and Experiment 4 was conducted in the laboratory. Participants were trained with CSs+ and CSs-, and they could avoid an aversive outcome during presentations of the CSs+ by pressing their space bar at a specific time. If successful, the aversive outcome was not presented but instead a safety signal was. Participants were then tested-whilst on extinction-with two new ambiguous test CSs. If participants made an avoidance response, one of the test CSs produced the trained safety signal and the other was a control. In Experiments 1 and 4, the control was followed by no signal. In Experiment 2, the control was followed by a signal that differed in one dimension (color) with the trained safety signal, and in Experiment 3, the control differed in two dimensions (shape and color) from the trained safety signal. Experiment 5 tested the reinforcing properties of the safety signal using a choice procedure and a new response during test. We observed that participants made more avoidance responses to the ambiguous test CSs when followed by the trained signal in Experiments 1, 3, 4, and 5 (but not in Experiment 2). Overall, these results suggest that trained safety signals can reinforce avoidance behavior in humans.

References

Sangha S, Diehl M, Bergstrom H, Drew M . Know safety, no fear. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019; 108:218-230. PMC: 6981293. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.006. View

Perez O, Dickinson A . Dual-system free-operant avoidance: Extension of a theory. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2024; 50(3):225-234. DOI: 10.1037/xan0000377. View

Fernando A, Urcelay G, Mar A, Dickinson T, Robbins T . The role of the nucleus accumbens shell in the mediation of the reinforcing properties of a safety signal in free-operant avoidance: dopamine-dependent inhibitory effects of d-amphetamine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013; 39(6):1420-30. PMC: 3988545. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2013.337. View

Lohr J, Olatunji B, Sawchuk C . A functional analysis of danger and safety signals in anxiety disorders. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006; 27(1):114-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.07.005. View

Lovaas I, Newsom C, Hickman C . Self-stimulatory behavior and perceptual reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 1987; 20(1):45-68. PMC: 1285951. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-45. View

Dinsmoor J . Escape, avoidance, punishment: where do we stand?. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977; 28(1):83-95. PMC: 1333616. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.28-83. View

Leng L, Beckers T, Vervliet B . What a relief! The pleasure of threat avoidance. Emotion. 2023; 24(3):539-550. DOI: 10.1037/emo0001312. View

Scholten W, Batelaan N, van Balkom A, Penninx B, Smit J, van Oppen P . Recurrence of anxiety disorders and its predictors. J Affect Disord. 2012; 147(1-3):180-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.10.031. View

Leknes S, Lee M, Berna C, Andersson J, Tracey I . Relief as a reward: hedonic and neural responses to safety from pain. PLoS One. 2011; 6(4):e17870. PMC: 3072382. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017870. View

10.

De Kleine R, Hutschemaekers M, Hendriks G, Kampman M, Papalini S, Van Minnen A . Impaired action-safety learning and excessive relief during avoidance in patients with anxiety disorders. J Anxiety Disord. 2023; 96:102698. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102698. View

11.

San Martin C, Jacobs B, Vervliet B . Further characterization of relief dynamics in the conditioning and generalization of avoidance: Effects of distress tolerance and intolerance of uncertainty. Behav Res Ther. 2019; 124:103526. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103526. View

12.

Graham B, Milad M . The study of fear extinction: implications for anxiety disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2011; 168(12):1255-65. PMC: 4118766. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11040557. View

13.

Seymour B, ODoherty J, Koltzenburg M, Wiech K, Frackowiak R, Friston K . Opponent appetitive-aversive neural processes underlie predictive learning of pain relief. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8(9):1234-40. DOI: 10.1038/nn1527. View

14.

Angelakis I, Austin J . Maintenance of safety behaviors via response-produced stimuli. Behav Modif. 2015; 39(6):932-54. DOI: 10.1177/0145445515610314. View

15.

Vervliet B, Indekeu E . Low-Cost Avoidance Behaviors are Resistant to Fear Extinction in Humans. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016; 9:351. PMC: 4689807. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00351. View

16.

Cassaday H, Muir C, Stevenson C, Bonardi C, Hock R, Waite L . From safety to frustration: The neural substrates of inhibitory learning in aversive and appetitive conditioning procedures. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2023; 202:107757. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2023.107757. View

17.

Rescorla R . Establishment of a positive reinforcer through contrast with shock. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1969; 67(2):260-3. DOI: 10.1037/h0026789. View

18.

Fernando A, Urcelay G, Mar A, Dickinson A, Robbins T . Safety signals as instrumental reinforcers during free-operant avoidance. Learn Mem. 2014; 21(9):488-97. PMC: 4138357. DOI: 10.1101/lm.034603.114. View

19.

Flores A, Lopez F, Vervliet B, Cobos P . Intolerance of uncertainty as a vulnerability factor for excessive and inflexible avoidance behavior. Behav Res Ther. 2018; 104:34-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.02.008. View

20.

Vervliet B, Lange I, Milad M . Temporal dynamics of relief in avoidance conditioning and fear extinction: Experimental validation and clinical relevance. Behav Res Ther. 2017; 96:66-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.04.011. View