» Articles » PMID: 39259312

Better Restoration of Joint Line Obliquity in Tibia First Restricted Kinematic Alignment Versus Mechanical Alignment TKA

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), suboptimal restoration of joint line obliquity (JLO) and joint line height (JLH) may lead to diminished implant longevity, increased risk of complications, and reduced patient reported outcomes. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) leads to improved restoration of JLO and JLH compared to mechanical alignment (MA) in TKA.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective study assessed patients who underwent single implant design TKA for primary osteoarthritis, either MA with manual instrumentation or rKA assisted with imageless navigation robotic arm TKA. Pre- and post-operative long standing AP X-ray imaging were used to measure JLO formed between the proximal tibial joint line and the floor. JLH was measured as the distance from the femoral articular surface to the adductor tubercle.

Results: Overall, 200 patients (100 patients in each group) were included. Demographics between the two groups including age, sex, ASA, laterality, and BMI did not significantly differ. Distribution of KL osteoarthritis classification was similar between the groups. For the MA group, pre- to post-operative JLO significantly changed (2.94° vs. 2.31°, p = 0.004). No significant changes were found between pre- and post-operative JLH (40.6 mm vs. 40.6 mm, p = 0.89). For the rKA group, no significant changes were found between pre- and post-operative JLO (2.43° vs. 2.30°, p = 0.57). Additionally, no significant changes were found between pre- and post-operative JLH (41.2 mm vs. 42.4 mm, p = 0.17). Pre- to post-operative JLO alteration was five times higher in the MA group compared to the rKA group, although this comparison between groups did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.09).

Conclusion: rKA-TKA results in high restoration accuracy of JLO and JLH, and demonstrates less pre- and post-operative JLO alteration compared to MA-TKA. With risen interest in joint line restoration accuracy with kinematic alignment, these findings suggest potential advantages compared to MA. Future investigation is needed to correlate between joint line restoration accuracy achieved by rKA and enhanced implant longevity, reduced risk of post-operative complications, and heightened patient satisfaction.

Citing Articles

Distribution and gender-specific differences of coronal plane alignment of healthy knee.

Phruetthiphat O, Pinijprapa P, Uthaicharatratsame C J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):879.

PMID: 39726012 PMC: 11670395. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05380-w.

References
1.
Koshire S, Mohanty S, Keny S, Rai A, Rathod T, Kamble P . The influence of joint line restoration on functional outcome after primary total knee arthroplasty: A prospective study. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022; 34:102023. PMC: 9490095. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.102023. View

2.
Fornalski S, McGarry M, Bui C, Kim W, Lee T . Biomechanical effects of joint line elevation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012; 27(8):824-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.05.009. View

3.
Liow M, Xia Z, Wong M, Tay K, Yeo S, Chin P . Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(12):2373-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.010. View

4.
Bieger R, Huch K, Kocak S, Jung S, Reichel H, Kappe T . The influence of joint line restoration on the results of revision total knee arthroplasty: comparison between distance and ratio-methods. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014; 134(4):537-41. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-014-1953-4. View

5.
MacDessi S, Allom R, Griffiths-Jones W, Chen D, Wood J, Bellemans J . The importance of joint line obliquity: a radiological analysis of restricted boundaries in normal knee phenotypes to inform surgical decision making in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30(9):2931-2940. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-06872-0. View