» Articles » PMID: 39258121

The Relationships Between Upper and Lower Extremity Muscle Strength, Rate of Force Development, and Fatigue in Adults

Overview
Journal Int J Exerc Sci
Date 2024 Sep 11
PMID 39258121
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electronic handgrip dynamometry allows for multiple muscle function aspects to be feasibly measured, yet their relationship with lower extremity muscle function is unknown. We sought to determine the relationships between upper and lower extremity mechanical isometric muscle strength, rate of force development (RFD), and endurance by limb dominance in resistance trained adults. The analytic sample included 30 adults aged 32.1 ± 13.5 years. An electronic handgrip dynamometer ascertained upper extremity strength capacity, RFD, and endurance. Lower extremity strength, RFD, and endurance were collected with the isometric feature on an isokinetic knee dynamometer. Limb dominance was self-reported. Pearson correlations were used for the analyses. Each muscle function attribute on the dominant limb of the upper and lower extremities were correlated: = 0.76 ( < 0.01) for strength, = 0.37 ( = 0.04) for RFD, and = -0.48 ( < 0.01) for endurance. Although strength from the non-dominant limbs were correlated ( = 0.67; < 0.01), no significant correlations were observed for RFD ( = 0.20; = 0.29) and endurance ( = -0.21; = 0.26). For adults aged 18-34 years, only upper and lower extremity strength was correlated on the dominant ( = 0.69; < 0.01) and non-dominant limbs ( = 0.75; < 0.01); however, strength ( = 0.88; < 0.01) and endurance ( = -0.68; = 0.01) were correlated in adults aged 35-70 years. Upper and lower extremity fatigability was likewise correlated in females ( = -0.56; = 0.01). Our findings suggest that electronic handgrip dynamometry derived strength, RFD, and endurance could be a whole-body indicator of these muscle function attributes given their relationships with the lower extremities. These findings underscore the promise of handgrip dynamometry in routine muscle function assessments across different age groups.

References
1.
Roberts H, Denison H, Martin H, Patel H, Syddall H, Cooper C . A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing. 2011; 40(4):423-9. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afr051. View

2.
Akoglu H . User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018; 18(3):91-93. PMC: 6107969. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001. View

3.
Ditroilo M, Forte R, Benelli P, Gambarara D, De Vito G . Effects of age and limb dominance on upper and lower limb muscle function in healthy males and females aged 40-80 years. J Sports Sci. 2010; 28(6):667-77. DOI: 10.1080/02640411003642098. View

4.
Haizlip K, Harrison B, Leinwand L . Sex-based differences in skeletal muscle kinetics and fiber-type composition. Physiology (Bethesda). 2015; 30(1):30-9. PMC: 4285578. DOI: 10.1152/physiol.00024.2014. View

5.
Cronin J, Lawton T, Harris N, Kilding A, McMaster D . A Brief Review of Handgrip Strength and Sport Performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2017; 31(11):3187-3217. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002149. View