» Articles » PMID: 39257534

Comparing South Dakota Pharmacist Perspectives of Pharmacy Services in Rural Versus Urban Settings

Overview
Date 2024 Sep 11
PMID 39257534
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Access to healthcare services is a major barrier to residents of the rural state of South Dakota. As a highly accessible member of the healthcare team, outpatient pharmacists can play a key role in a patient's healthcare journey. There is a need to identify the unique barriers and facilitators pharmacists in both rural and urban areas face to maximize the impact of their role.

Objective: The objective of this work was to compare perceptions of rural and urban pharmacists regarding the facilitators and barriers to providing patient care in South Dakota.

Methods: This qualitative project highlights results from interviews and focus group sessions with a convenience sample of South Dakota pharmacists. Participants were recruited using a referral word-of-mouth system, contracts with healthcare market research agencies, newspaper advertisements, and posters displayed in public locations in South Dakota. Practice location was characterized as rural or urban based on United States Department of Agriculture definitions. Findings from interviews and focus group sessions were coded and analyzed using content analysis by two student researchers.

Results: Participants included 12 rural-practicing and 21 urban-practicing pharmacists in South Dakota. In both rural and urban areas, key barriers included communication with providers (50% rural; 50% urban), lack of electronic health record access (25% rural; 14% urban), not enough staff (22% rural; 20% urban), and patient misunderstanding the scope of pharmacy (22% rural; 40% urban). Barriers specific to rural areas included time to provide services (22%), having smaller facilities (27%) and provider hesitation regarding collaborative practice agreements (29%). There were no urban-specific barriers. Facilitators specific to urban areas included frequent communication with patients (6.1%) and good quality support staff (9.1%). There were no rural-specific facilitators.

Conclusions: Next steps include increasing awareness of pharmacy-based patient care services, researching further to identify the extent to which facilitators and barriers influence the ability to initiate and sustain pharmacy services in rural and urban areas, and providing support to pharmacies to overcome barriers and leverage facilitators.

Citing Articles

Impact of pharmacist-led interventions in identifying and resolving drug related problems and potentially inappropriate prescriptions among rural patients: A pilot study.

Gutierrez-Igual S, Lucas-Dominguez R, Sendra-Lillo J, Marti-Rodrigo A, Crespo I, Carmen Montesinos M Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024; 16:100536.

PMID: 39555326 PMC: 11567914. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100536.

References
1.
Kelly D, Young S, Phillips L, Clark D . Patient attitudes regarding the role of the pharmacist and interest in expanded pharmacist services. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2014; 147(4):239-47. PMC: 4212442. DOI: 10.1177/1715163514535731. View

2.
Pinto S, Bechtol R, Partha G . Evaluation of outcomes of a medication therapy management program for patients with diabetes. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2012; 52(4):519-23. DOI: 10.1331/JAPhA.2012.10098. View

3.
Eades C, Ferguson J, OCarroll R . Public health in community pharmacy: a systematic review of pharmacist and consumer views. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:582. PMC: 3146877. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-582. View

4.
Pinto S, Kotschevar C, Hunt A, Middendorf A, Robbins C, Miller E . Impact of a Public Health Awareness Campaign on Patients' Perceptions of Expanded Pharmacy Services in South Dakota Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Pharmacy (Basel). 2022; 10(6). PMC: 9788309. DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy10060178. View

5.
Bukhari N, Rasheed H, Nayyer B, Babar Z . Pharmacists at the frontline beating the COVID-19 pandemic. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020; 13:8. PMC: 7168565. DOI: 10.1186/s40545-020-00210-w. View