» Articles » PMID: 39256672

Human Factors Methods in the Design of Digital Decision Support Systems for Population Health: a Scoping Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Sep 10
PMID 39256672
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: While Human Factors (HF) methods have been applied to the design of decision support systems (DSS) to aid clinical decision-making, the role of HF to improve decision-support for population health outcomes is less understood. We sought to comprehensively understand how HF methods have been used in designing digital population health DSS.

Materials And Methods: We searched English documents published in health sciences and engineering databases (Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Scopus, Comendex, Inspec, IEEE Xplore) between January 1990 and September 2023 describing the development, validation or application of HF principles to decision support tools in population health.

Results: We identified 21,581 unique records and included 153 studies for data extraction and synthesis. We included research articles that had a target end-user in population health and that used HF. HF methods were applied throughout the design lifecycle. Users were engaged early in the design lifecycle in the needs assessment and requirements gathering phase and design and prototyping phase with qualitative methods such as interviews. In later stages in the lifecycle, during user testing and evaluation, and post deployment evaluation, quantitative methods were more frequently used. However, only three studies used an experimental framework or conducted A/B testing.

Conclusions: While HF have been applied in a variety of contexts in the design of data-driven DSSs for population health, few have used Human Factors to its full potential. We offer recommendations for how HF can be leveraged throughout the design lifecycle. Most crucially, system designers should engage with users early on and throughout the design process. Our findings can support stakeholders to further empower public health systems.

References
1.
Riera-Montes M, Velicko I . The Chlamydia surveillance system in Sweden delivers relevant and accurate data: results from the system evaluation, 1997-2008. Euro Surveill. 2011; 16(27). View

2.
Sittig D, Belmont E, Singh H . Improving the safety of health information technology requires shared responsibility: It is time we all step up. Healthc (Amst). 2017; 6(1):7-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2017.06.004. View

3.
Azofeifa A, Yeung L, Duke C, Gilboa S, Correa A . Evaluation of an active surveillance system for stillbirths in metropolitan Atlanta. J Registry Manag. 2012; 39(1):13-8, quiz 36. PMC: 4532308. View

4.
Wu E, Villani J, Davis A, Fareed N, Harris D, Huerta T . Community dashboards to support data-informed decision-making in the HEALing communities study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020; 217:108331. PMC: 7528750. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108331. View

5.
Fisher R, Myers B . Free and simple GIS as appropriate for health mapping in a low resource setting: a case study in eastern Indonesia. Int J Health Geogr. 2011; 10:15. PMC: 3051879. DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-10-15. View