» Articles » PMID: 39250334

Updated Risk Score Algorithms for Acute HIV Infection Detection at a Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi

Abstract

Background: Detection of acute (preseroconversion) HIV infection (AHI), the phase of highest transmission risk, requires resource-intensive RNA- or antigen-based detection methods that can be infeasible for routine use. Risk score algorithms can improve the efficiency of AHI detection by identifying persons at highest risk of AHI for prioritized RNA/antigen testing, but prior algorithms have not considered geospatial information, potential differences by sex, or current antibody testing paradigms.

Methods: We used elastic net models to develop sex-stratified risk score algorithms in a case-control study of persons (136 with AHI, 250 without HIV) attending a sexually transmitted infections (STI) clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi, from 2015 to 2019. We designed algorithms for varying clinical contexts according to 3 levels of data availability: (1) routine demographic and clinical information, (2) behavioral and occupational data obtainable through patient interview, and (3) geospatial variables requiring external datasets or field data collection. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to assess model performance and developed a web application to support implementation.

Results: The highest performing AHI risk score algorithm for men (AUC = 0.74) contained 5 variables (condom use, body aches, fever, rash, genital sores/ulcers) from the first 2 levels of data availability. The highest performing algorithm for women (AUC = 0.81) contained 15 variables from all 3 levels of data availability. A risk score cut point of 0.26 had an AHI detection sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 27% for men, and a cut point of 0.15 had 97% sensitivity and 44% specificity for women. Additional models are available in the web application.

Conclusions: Risk score algorithms can facilitate efficient AHI detection in STI clinic settings, creating opportunities for HIV transmission prevention interventions during this critical period of elevated transmission risk.

References
1.
Herce M, Miller W, Bula A, Edwards J, Sapalalo P, Lancaster K . Achieving the first 90 for key populations in sub-Saharan Africa through venue-based outreach: challenges and opportunities for HIV prevention based on PLACE study findings from Malawi and Angola. J Int AIDS Soc. 2018; 21 Suppl 5:e25132. PMC: 6055127. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25132. View

2.
Pilcher C, Joaki G, Hoffman I, Martinson F, Mapanje C, Stewart P . Amplified transmission of HIV-1: comparison of HIV-1 concentrations in semen and blood during acute and chronic infection. AIDS. 2007; 21(13):1723-30. PMC: 2673564. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3281532c82. View

3.
J Wawer M, H Gray R, Sewankambo N, Serwadda D, Li X, Laeyendecker O . Rates of HIV-1 transmission per coital act, by stage of HIV-1 infection, in Rakai, Uganda. J Infect Dis. 2005; 191(9):1403-9. DOI: 10.1086/429411. View

4.
Powers K, Ghani A, Miller W, Hoffman I, Pettifor A, Kamanga G . The role of acute and early HIV infection in the spread of HIV and implications for transmission prevention strategies in Lilongwe, Malawi: a modelling study. Lancet. 2011; 378(9787):256-68. PMC: 3274419. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60842-8. View

5.
Anglewicz P, Clark S . The effect of marriage and HIV risks on condom use acceptability in rural Malawi. Soc Sci Med. 2013; 97:29-40. PMC: 3811016. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.024. View