Resuscitation of Patients with Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support with Acutely Altered Perfusion or Cardiac Arrest: A Scoping Review

Overview

Journal Resuscitation

Specialty Emergency Medicine

Date 2024 Sep 8

PMID 39245405

Authors

Ari Moskowitz

Helen Pocock

Anthony Lagina

Kee Chong Ng

Barnaby R Scholefield

Carolyn M Zelop

Janet Bray

Joseph Rossano

Nicholas J Johnson

Joel Dunning

Theresa Olasveengen

Tia Raymond

David L S Morales

Anthony Carlese

Marie Elias

Katherine M Berg

Ian Drennan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: There is an increasing prevalence of durable mechanical circulatory supported patients in both the in-and-out of hospital communities. The scientific literature regarding the approach to patients supported by durable mechanical circulatory devices who suffer acutely impaired perfusion has not been well explored.

Methods: The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Advanced, Basic, and Pediatric Life Support Task Forces conducted a scoping review of the literature using a population, context, and concept framework.

Results: A total of 32 publications that included patients who were receiving durable mechanical circulatory support and required acute resuscitation were identified. Most of the identified studies were case reports or small case series. Of these, 11 (34.4%) included patients who received chest compressions. A number of studies reported upon delays in the application of chest compressions resulting from complexity due to the expected pulselessness in some patients with continuous flow left-ventricular assist devices as well as from concern regarding potential dislodgement of the mechanical circulatory support device. Three observational studies identified worse outcomes in durable mechanical circulatory support receiving patients with cardiac arrest and acutely impaired perfusion who received chest compressions as compared to those who did not, however those studies were at high risk of bias. Of 226 patients across 11 studies and two published scientific abstracts who sustained cardiac arrest while supported by durable MCS and underwent chest compressions, there were no reported instances of device dislodgement and 71 (31.4%) patients had favorable outcomes.

Conclusions: There is a scarcity of evidence to inform the resuscitation of patients with durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) experiencing acute impairment in perfusion and cardiac arrest. Reports indicate that delays in resuscitation often stem from rescuers' uncertainty about the safety of administering chest compressions. Notably, no instances of device dislodgement have been documented following chest compressions, suggesting that the risk of harm from timely CPR in these patients is minimal.

References

Iwashita Y, Ito A, Sasaki K, Suzuki K, Fujioka M, Maruyama K . Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of a cardiac arrest patient with left ventricular assist device in an out-of-hospital setting: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(2):e18658. PMC: 6959936. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018658. View

Mathias I, Burkhoff D, Bhimaraj A . Cardiac Tamponade With a Transaortic Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device: When Alarms Caused No Alarm. JACC Case Rep. 2023; 19:101936. PMC: 10429294. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2023.101936. View

Munn Z, Peters M, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E . Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18(1):143. PMC: 6245623. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x. View

Senman B, Pierce J, Kittipibul V, Barnes S, Whitacre M, Katz J . Safety of Chest Compressions in Patients With a Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device. JACC Heart Fail. 2024; 12(11):1928-1930. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.03.004. View

Schweiger M, Vierecke J, Stiegler P, Prenner G, Tscheliessnigg K, Wasler A . Prehospital care of left ventricular assist device patients by emergency medical services. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012; 16(4):560-3. DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2012.702192. View

Barssoum K, Patel H, Rai D, Kumar A, Hassib M, Othman H . Outcomes of Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device; an Insight From a National Inpatient Sample. Heart Lung Circ. 2021; 31(2):246-254. DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.05.096. View

Rottenberg E . eComment. The thoracic configuration of patients with left ventricular assist devices likely determines whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation using sternal compressions is both safe and effective. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014; 19(2):289. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu199. View

Ratman K, Bielka A, Kalinowski M, Herdynska-Was M, Przybylowski P, Zembala M . Permanent cardiac arrest in a patient with a left ventricular assist device support. Kardiol Pol. 2022; 80(6):709-710. DOI: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0115. View

Duff J, Decaen A, Garcia Guerra G, Lequier L, Buchholz H . Diagnosis and management of circulatory arrest in pediatric ventricular assist device patients: presentation of two cases and suggested guidelines. Resuscitation. 2012; 84(5):702-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.09.032. View

10.

Pokrajac N, Cantwell L, Murray J, Dykes J . Characteristics and Outcomes of Pediatric Patients With a Ventricular Assist Device Presenting to the Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021; 38(2):e924-e928. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002493. View

11.

Eyituoyo H, Aben R, Arinze N, Vu D, James E . Ventricular Fibrillation 7 Years After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation. Am J Case Rep. 2020; 21:e923711. PMC: 7327732. DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.923711. View

12.

Harper R, Ludwig J, Morcos M, Morris S . Myocardial Irritation from a Left Ventricular Assist Device Resulting in Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia. J Emerg Med. 2018; 56(1):87-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.09.013. View

13.

Mulukutla V, Lam W, Simpson L, Mathuria N . Successful catheter ablation of hemodynamically significant ventricular tachycardia in a patient with biventricular assist device support. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2017; 1(4):209-212. PMC: 5419334. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2015.02.015. View

14.

Cubillo 4th E, Weis R, Ramakrishna H . Emergent reconnection of a transected left ventricular assist device driveline. J Emerg Med. 2014; 47(5):546-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.07.028. View

15.

Bouchez S, De Somer F, Herck I, Van Belleghem Y, De Pauw M, Stroobandt R . Shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation in a patient implanted with a left ventricular assist device. Resuscitation. 2016; 107:e1-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.06.034. View

16.

Varshney A, Defilippis E, Cowger J, Netuka I, Pinney S, Givertz M . Trends and Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: JACC Focus Seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022; 79(11):1092-1107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.017. View

17.

Esangbedo I, Yu P . Chest Compressions in Pediatric Patients With Continuous-Flow Ventricular Assist Devices: Case Series and Proposed Algorithm. Front Pediatr. 2022; 10:883320. PMC: 9253534. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.883320. View

18.

Shinar Z, Bellezzo J, Stahovich M, Cheskes S, Chillcott S, Dembitsky W . Chest compressions may be safe in arresting patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Resuscitation. 2014; 85(5):702-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.01.003. View

19.

Andersen M, Videbaek R, Boesgaard S, Sander K, B Hansen P, Gustafsson F . Incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients on long-term support with a continuous-flow assist device (HeartMate II). J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009; 28(7):733-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.03.011. View

20.

Saito S, Toda K, Miyagawa S, Yoshikawa Y, Hata H, Yoshioka D . Therapeutic hypothermia after global cerebral ischemia due to left ventricular assist device malfunction. J Artif Organs. 2019; 22(3):246-248. DOI: 10.1007/s10047-019-01099-2. View