Social and Nonsocial Synchrony Are Interrelated and Romantically Attractive

Overview

Journal Commun Psychol

Publisher Nature Portfolio

Date 2024 Sep 6

PMID 39242962

Authors

M Cohen

M Abargil

M Ahissar

S Atzil

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The mechanisms of romantic bonding in humans are largely unknown. Recent research suggests that physiological synchrony between partners is associated with bonding. This study combines an experimental approach with a naturalistic dating setup to test whether the individual differences in social and nonsocial synchrony are interdependent, and linked to romantic attractiveness. In a preregistered online experiment with 144 participants, we discover that inducing physiological synchrony between an actor and an actress determines their attractiveness ratings by participants, indicating that synchrony can increase perceived attraction. In a lab-based naturalistic speed-dating experiment, we quantify in 48 participants the individual tendency for social physiological synchrony, nonsocial sensorimotor synchrony, and romantic attractiveness. We discover that the individual propensity to synchronize in social and nonsocial tasks is correlated. Some individuals synchronize better regardless of partners or tasks, and such Super Synchronizers are rated as more attractive. Altogether, this demonstrates that humans prefer romantic partners who can synchronize.

References

Cote L, Bornstein M . Synchrony in mother-infant vocal interactions revealed through timed event sequences. Infant Behav Dev. 2021; 64:101599. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101599. View

Bar M . The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007; 11(7):280-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005. View

Atzil S, Hendler T, Feldman R . Specifying the neurobiological basis of human attachment: brain, hormones, and behavior in synchronous and intrusive mothers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011; 36(13):2603-15. PMC: 3230500. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2011.172. View

Braithwaite S, Holt-Lunstad J . Romantic relationships and mental health. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017; 13:120-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.001. View

Tschacher W, Meier D . Physiological synchrony in psychotherapy sessions. Psychother Res. 2019; 30(5):558-573. DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2019.1612114. View

Djerassi M, Ophir S, Atzil S . What Is Social about Autism? The Role of Allostasis-Driven Learning. Brain Sci. 2021; 11(10). PMC: 8534207. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11101269. View

Borkenau P, Mauer N, Riemann R, Spinath F, Angleitner A . Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004; 86(4):599-614. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599. View

Atzil S, Gendron M . Bio-behavioral synchrony promotes the development of conceptualized emotions. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017; 17:162-169. PMC: 5617801. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.009. View

Goldstein P, Weissman-Fogel I, Dumas G, Shamay-Tsoory S . Brain-to-brain coupling during handholding is associated with pain reduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(11):E2528-E2537. PMC: 5856497. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1703643115. View

10.

Feldman R, Magori-Cohen R, Galili G, Singer M, Louzoun Y . Mother and infant coordinate heart rhythms through episodes of interaction synchrony. Infant Behav Dev. 2011; 34(4):569-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.06.008. View

11.

Grammer , Kruck , Juette , Fink . Non-verbal behavior as courtship signals: the role of control and choice in selecting partners. Evol Hum Behav. 2001; 21(6):371-390. DOI: 10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00053-2. View

12.

WEISS R, Aved B . Marital satisfaction and depression as predictors of physical health status. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1978; 46(6):1379-84. View

13.

Feldman R, GREENBAUM C, Yirmiya N . Mother-infant affect synchrony as an antecedent of the emergence of self-control. Dev Psychol. 1999; 35(1):223-31. DOI: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.1.223. View

14.

Pietromonaco P, Beck L . Adult attachment and physical health. Curr Opin Psychol. 2018; 25:115-120. PMC: 6191372. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.04.004. View

15.

Vanutelli M, Gatti L, Angioletti L, Balconi M . Affective Synchrony and Autonomic Coupling during Cooperation: A Hyperscanning Study. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:3104564. PMC: 5723953. DOI: 10.1155/2017/3104564. View

16.

Ariani G, Kordjazi N, Pruszynski J, Diedrichsen J . The Planning Horizon for Movement Sequences. eNeuro. 2021; 8(2). PMC: 8174040. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0085-21.2021. View

17.

Powers S, Pietromonaco P, Gunlicks M, Sayer A . Dating couples' attachment styles and patterns of cortisol reactivity and recovery in response to a relationship conflict. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 90(4):613-28. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.613. View

18.

Cao Z, Hidalgo G, Simon T, Wei S, Sheikh Y . OpenPose: Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2019; 43(1):172-186. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2929257. View

19.

Pietromonaco P, Collins N . Interpersonal mechanisms linking close relationships to health. Am Psychol. 2017; 72(6):531-542. PMC: 5598782. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000129. View

20.

Saxbe D, Edelstein R, Lyden H, Wardecker B, Chopik W, Moors A . Fathers' decline in testosterone and synchrony with partner testosterone during pregnancy predicts greater postpartum relationship investment. Horm Behav. 2016; 90:39-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.07.005. View