» Articles » PMID: 39240564

Conservative Treatments in the Management of Acute Painful Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal JAMA Netw Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Sep 6
PMID 39240564
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) frequently cause substantial pain and reduced mobility, posing a major health problem. Despite the critical need for effective pain management to restore functionality and improve patient outcomes, the value of various conservative treatments for acute VCF has not been systematically investigated.

Objective: To assess and compare different conservative treatment options in managing acute pain related to VCF.

Data Sources: On May 16, 2023, 4 databases-PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL-were searched. In addition, a gray literature search within Scopus and Embase was also conducted.

Study Selection: Included studies were prospective comparative and randomized clinical trials that assessed conservative treatments for acute VCF.

Data Extraction And Synthesis: Data extraction and synthesis were performed by 2 authors according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Network Meta-Analyses recommendations. A frequentist graph-theoretical model and a random-effects model were applied for the meta-analysis.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Primary outcomes were short-term (4 weeks) pain during activity and long-term (latest available follow-up) nonspecified pain in patients with acute VCF.

Results: The study included 20 trials, encompassing 2102 patients, and evaluated various interventions for managing VCF. Calcitonin (standardized mean difference [SMD], -4.86; 95% CI, -6.87 to -2.86) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; SMD, -3.94; 95% CI, -7.30 to -0.58) were beneficial regarding short-term pain during activity compared with placebo. For long-term nonspecific pain management, bisphosphonates were associated with inferior pain outcomes compared with daily (SMD, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.11 to 2.31) or weekly (SMD, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.05 to 2.21) administration of teriparatide, with no treatment being superior to NSAIDs. The qualitative analysis of adverse events highlighted that typical adverse events associated with these medications were observed.

Conclusions And Relevance: NSAIDs and teriparatide may be the preferred treatment options for pain management in acute osteoporotic VCF. Although calcitonin also proved to be beneficial, its safety profile and potential adverse effects restrict its widespread application. The limited evidence on braces and analgesics underscores the urgent need for future research.

Citing Articles

Safety and feasibility of a smart assistive bone-cement injection system: a cadaveric study.

Jin C, Ning M, Xu R, Ye X, Chen H, Yu J J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):272.

PMID: 40075404 PMC: 11905486. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05680-9.


Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach in Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis Complicated with Intramural Descending Aorta Hematoma Followed by Aortic Wall Rupture.

Ciobica M, Botezatu A, Galajda Z, Carsote M, Nistor C, Sandulescu B Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39857028 PMC: 11763346. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15020144.

References
1.
Chen P, Miller P, Delmas P, Misurski D, Krege J . Change in lumbar spine BMD and vertebral fracture risk reduction in teriparatide-treated postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2006; 21(11):1785-90. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.060802. View

2.
Barr J, Jensen M, Hirsch J, McGraw J, Barr R, Brook A . Position statement on percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a consensus statement developed by the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR), American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS),.... J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013; 25(2):171-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.10.001. View

3.
Genant H, Jergas M, Palermo L, Nevitt M, Valentin R, Black D . Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res. 1996; 11(7):984-96. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650110716. View

4.
Sterne J, Savovic J, Page M, Elbers R, Blencowe N, Boutron I . RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019; 366:l4898. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4898. View

5.
Dias S, Welton N, Caldwell D, Ades A . Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2010; 29(7-8):932-44. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3767. View