» Articles » PMID: 39240533

Towards a Model of Eye-movement Control in Chinese Reading

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2024 Sep 6
PMID 39240533
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Chinese writing system has several features that make it markedly different from the alphabetic systems that have most often been examined in reading research, including the fact that individual words consist of various uniformly sized, box-shaped characters whose boundaries are not clearly demarcated (e.g., by blank spaces). These features raise the question: How do readers of Chinese "know" where to move their eyes for the purpose of efficiently segmenting and/or identifying words? To answer this question, we used the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading to run an 'experiment' involving a series of simulations in which two saccade-targeting assumptions (i.e., directing the eyes towards default targets vs. adjusting saccade length as a function of parafoveal processing difficulty) were factorially manipulated with three word-segmentation heuristics (i.e., ideal-observer knowledge of word boundaries vs. probabilistic guessing vs. familiarity-based segmentation) to examine which combination of assumptions provide the best quantitative account of eye-movement control during the reading of Chinese. Based on these simulations, we conclude the best account is one in which readers use relative differences in the familiarity of groups of parafoveal characters to dynamically adjust the lengths of saccades in a manner that affords efficient word identification. We discuss the broader theoretical implications of these conclusions for models of Chinese reading and for models of reading more generally.

Citing Articles

The role of format familiarity and semantic transparency in Chinese reading: evidence from eye movements.

Chen M, Wang L, Liu S, Liu D BMC Psychol. 2025; 13(1):207.

PMID: 40050902 PMC: 11887072. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-02397-6.

References
1.
Bai X, Yan G, Liversedge S, Zang C, Rayner K . Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: evidence from eye movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008; 34(5):1277-87. PMC: 2662925. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1277. View

2.
Balota D, Yap M, Cortese M, Hutchison K, Kessler B, Loftis B . The English Lexicon Project. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(3):445-59. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193014. View

3.
Bubic A, von Cramon D, Schubotz R . Prediction, cognition and the brain. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010; 4:25. PMC: 2904053. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00025. View

4.
Chang Y, Welbourne S, Lee C . Exploring orthographic neighborhood size effects in a computational model of Chinese character naming. Cogn Psychol. 2016; 91:1-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.09.001. View

5.
Coltheart M, Rastle K, Perry C, Langdon R, Ziegler J . DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol Rev. 2001; 108(1):204-56. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204. View