» Articles » PMID: 39238838

Household Air Pollution Disparities Between Socioeconomic Groups in Chicago

Overview
Date 2024 Sep 6
PMID 39238838
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: To assess household air pollution levels in urban Chicago households and examine how socioeconomic factors influence these levels. : We deployed wireless air monitoring devices to 244 households in a diverse population in Chicago to continuously record household fine particulate matter (PM) concentration. We calculated hourly average PM concentration in a 24-hour cycle. Four factors-race, household income, area deprivation, and exposure to smoking-were considered in this study. : A total of 93085 h of exposure data were recorded. The average household PM concentration was 43.8 μg m. We observed a significant difference in the average household PM concentrations between Black/African American and non-Black/African American households (46.3 versus 31.6 μg m), between high-income and low-income households (18.2 versus 52.5 μg m), and between smoking and non-smoking households (69.7 versus 29.0 μg m). However, no significant difference was observed between households in less and more deprived areas (43.7 versus 43.0 μg m). : Household air pollution levels in Chicago households are much higher than the recommended level, challenging the hypothesis that household air quality is adequate for populations in high income nations. Our results indicate that it is the personal characteristics of participants, rather than the macro environments, that lead to observed differences in household air pollution.

References
1.
Rogalsky D, Mendola P, Metts T, Martin 2nd W . Estimating the number of low-income americans exposed to household air pollution from burning solid fuels. Environ Health Perspect. 2014; 122(8):806-10. PMC: 4123020. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1306709. View

2.
Russo E, Hulse T, Adamkiewicz G, Levy D, Bethune L, Kane J . Comparison of indoor air quality in smoke-permitted and smoke-free multiunit housing: findings from the Boston Housing Authority. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014; 17(3):316-22. PMC: 4837992. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu146. View

3.
Bousiotis D, Alconcel L, Beddows D, Harrison R, Pope F . Monitoring and apportioning sources of indoor air quality using low-cost particulate matter sensors. Environ Int. 2023; 174:107907. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107907. View

4.
Doyi I, Strezov V, Isley C, Yazdanparast T, Taylor M . The relevance of particle size distribution and bioaccessibility on human health risk assessment for trace elements measured in indoor dust. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 733:137931. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137931. View

5.
Adgate J, Church T, Ryan A, Ramachandran G, Fredrickson A, Stock T . Outdoor, indoor, and personal exposure to VOCs in children. Environ Health Perspect. 2004; 112(14):1386-92. PMC: 1247565. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7107. View