» Articles » PMID: 39237887

Validity and Reliability of the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition 15 (PAIC15) Observation Scale in Persons with Aphasia

Overview
Journal BMC Neurol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Sep 5
PMID 39237887
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The use of self-report pain scales in persons with aphasia can be challenging due to communication and cognitive problems, while for assessing pain self-report pain is considered the gold standard (Harrison RA, Field TS. Post stroke pain: identification, assessment, and therapy. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;39(3-4):190-201.). An observational scale may be used as an alternative. This study examines the validity and reliability of the observational Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition (PAIC15) scale in persons with aphasia.

Methods: Persons with aphasia were observed during rest and transfer by two observers using the PAIC15. The PAIC15 comprises 15 items covering the three domains of facial expressions, body movements, and vocalizations. When able, the participant completed four self-report pain scales after each observation. The observations were repeated within one week. For criterion validity, correlations between the PAIC15 and self-report pain scales were calculated and for construct validity, three hypotheses were tested. Reliability was determined by assessing internal consistency, and intra- and interobserver agreement.

Results: PAIC15 observations were obtained for 71 persons (mean age 75.5 years) with aphasia. Fair positive correlations (rest: 0.35-0.50; transfer: 0.38-0.43) were reported between PAIC15 and almost all self-report pain scales. Results show that significantly more pain was observed in persons with aphasia during transfer than during rest. No differences were found for observed pain between persons with aphasia who use pain medication and those without, or persons who have joint diseases compared to those without. Results showed acceptable internal consistency. Intra- and interobserver agreement was high for most PAIC15 items, particularly for the domains body movements and vocalizations during rest and transfer.

Conclusions: Recognition of pain in persons aphasia using the PAIC15 showed mixed yet promising results.

Citing Articles

User-friendliness of the pain assessment in impaired cognition (PAIC15) in persons with aphasia: a pilot study.

de Vries N, Smaling H, van der Steen J, Achterberg W Future Sci OA. 2025; 11(1):2456440.

PMID: 39868682 PMC: 11776862. DOI: 10.1080/20565623.2025.2456440.

References
1.
van Dalen-Kok A, Achterberg W, Rijkmans W, de Vet H, de Waal M . Pain assessment in impaired cognition: observer agreement in a long-term care setting in patients with dementia. Pain Manag. 2019; 9(5):461-473. DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2019-0025. View

2.
de Waal M, van Dalen-Kok A, de Vet H, Gimenez-Llort L, Konstantinovic L, de Tommaso M . Observational pain assessment in older persons with dementia in four countries: Observer agreement of items and factor structure of the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition. Eur J Pain. 2019; 24(2):279-296. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1484. View

3.
Liampas A, Velidakis N, Georgiou T, Vadalouca A, Varrassi G, Hadjigeorgiou G . Prevalence and Management Challenges in Central Post-Stroke Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Adv Ther. 2020; 37(7):3278-3291. PMC: 7467424. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01388-w. View

4.
Rajkumar A, Ballard C, Fossey J, Orrell M, Moniz-Cook E, Woods R . Epidemiology of Pain in People With Dementia Living in Care Homes: Longitudinal Course, Prevalence, and Treatment Implications. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017; 18(5):453.e1-453.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.01.024. View

5.
Husebo B, Achterberg W, Flo E . Identifying and Managing Pain in People with Alzheimer's Disease and Other Types of Dementia: A Systematic Review. CNS Drugs. 2016; 30(6):481-97. PMC: 4920848. DOI: 10.1007/s40263-016-0342-7. View