» Articles » PMID: 39237550

Decoding Stakeholder Priorities of Safety Culture Preferences in the Oil and Gas Industry

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Sep 5
PMID 39237550
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Safety culture is a critical determinant of organisational performance, particularly in high-risk industries especially in oil and gas. Understanding stakeholder preferences is essential for developing effective strategies that enhance safety culture. This study utilised the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to prioritise stakeholder preferences, identifying key elements of safety culture in Malaysia's oil and gas sector. This study employed a structured methodology to evaluate safety culture within the oil and gas industry, focusing on 18 sub-elements across three key domains: psychological, behavioural, and situational factors. A diverse sample of industry experts was recruited using purposeful and snowball sampling to ensure a comprehensive representation of stakeholder views. The AHP framework was applied to analyse the data, utilizing structured questionnaires and multicriteria decision-making techniques to prioritize the identified safety culture elements. The AHP analysis identified distinct priorities among different professional groups within the oil and gas sector. Safety and Health Practitioners emphasized practical elements such as safety rules and management commitment, while academicians prioritized knowledge and training. Management personnel highlighted the importance of safety ownership and communication, whereas policymakers focused on broader, policy-oriented aspects. The findings suggest that safety culture improvement initiatives should be tailored to address the specific needs and priorities of each professional group. A nuanced understanding of stakeholder preferences is crucial for developing comprehensive strategies that integrate observable behaviours, situational conditions, and psychological factors, ultimately fostering a robust safety culture in the oil and gas industry.

References
1.
Naji G, Isha A, Alazzani A, Saleem M, Alzoraiki M . Assessing the Mediating Role of Safety Communication Between Safety Culture and Employees Safety Performance. Front Public Health. 2022; 10:840281. PMC: 8960200. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.840281. View

2.
Karamidehkordi E, Karimi V, Hallaj Z, Karimi M, Naderi L . Adaptable leadership for arid/semi-arid wetlands conservation under climate change: Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach. J Environ Manage. 2023; 351:119860. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119860. View

3.
Iqbal H, Waheed B, Haider H, Tesfamariam S, Sadiq R . Mapping safety culture attributes with integrity management program to achieve assessment goals: A framework for oil and gas pipelines industry. J Safety Res. 2019; 68:59-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.12.010. View

4.
van Nunen K, Reniers G, Ponnet K . Measuring Safety Culture Using an Integrative Approach: The Development of a Comprehensive Conceptual Framework and an Applied Safety Culture Assessment Instrument. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(20). PMC: 9602973. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013602. View

5.
Bisbey T, Kilcullen M, Thomas E, Ottosen M, Tsao K, Salas E . Safety Culture: An Integration of Existing Models and a Framework for Understanding Its Development. Hum Factors. 2019; 63(1):88-110. DOI: 10.1177/0018720819868878. View