Evaluating the Impact of a Standardised Intervention for Announcing Decisions of Withholding and Withdrawing Life-sustaining Treatments on the Stress of Relatives in Emergency Departments (DISCUSS): Protocol for a Stepped-wedge Randomised Controlled...

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Sep 5

PMID 39237283

Authors

Anne Termoz

Fabien Subtil

Pauline Drouin

Mathilde Marchal

Manon Verroul

Carole Langlois

Estelle Bravant

Laurent Jacquin

Benedicte Clement

Damien Viglino

Daniel Roux-Boniface

Frederic Verbois

Marine Demarquet

Xavier Dubucs

Delphine Douillet

Karim Tazarourte

Anne-Marie Schott-Pethelaz

Julie Haesebaert

Marion Douplat

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: The decisions of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments are difficult to make in the context of emergency departments (EDs) because most patients are unable to communicate. Relatives are thus asked to participate in the decision-making process, although they are unprepared to face such situations. We therefore aimed to develop a standardised intervention for announcing decisions of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in EDs and assess the efficacy of the intervention on the stress of relatives.

Methods And Analysis: The DISCUSS trial is a multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomised study and will be conducted at nine EDs in France. A standardised intervention based on human simulation will be codesigned with partner families and implemented at three levels: the relatives, the healthcare professionals (HCP) and the EDs. The intervention will be compared with a control based on treatment as usual. A total of 538 families are planned to be included: 269 in the intervention group and 269 in the control group. The primary endpoint will be the symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) at 90 days. The secondary endpoints will be symptoms of PTSD at 7 and 30 days, diagnosis of PTSD at 90 days and anxiety and depression scores at 7, 30 and 90 days. Satisfaction regarding the training, the assertiveness in communication and real-life stress of HCPs will be measured at 90 days.

Ethics And Dissemination: This study was approved by the ethics committee Est III from Nancy and the French national data protection authority. All relatives and HCPs will be informed regarding the study objectives and data confidentiality. Written informed consent will be obtained from participants, as required by French law for this study type. The results from this study will be disseminated at conferences and in a peer-reviewed journal.

Trial Registration Number: NCT06071078.

References

Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B . The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998; 3(4):322-55. DOI: 10.1037//1076-8998.3.4.322. View

Le Conte P, Baron D, Trewick D, Touze M, Longo C, Vial I . Withholding and withdrawing life-support therapy in an Emergency Department: prospective survey. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30(12):2216-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-004-2475-2. View

Le Conte P, Riochet D, Batard E, Volteau C, Giraudeau B, Arnaudet I . Death in emergency departments: a multicenter cross-sectional survey with analysis of withholding and withdrawing life support. Intensive Care Med. 2010; 36(5):765-72. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-1800-1. View

Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, Chevret S, Aboab J, Adrie C . Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005; 171(9):987-94. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200409-1295OC. View

Sagnol G, Haesebaert J, Termoz A, Michel P, Schott A, Potinet V . Assessing patient partnership among emergency departments in France: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):897. PMC: 10463322. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09905-7. View

Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W . Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015; 350:h1258. PMC: 4366184. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1258. View

Curtis J, Ciechanowski P, Downey L, Gold J, Nielsen E, Shannon S . Development and evaluation of an interprofessional communication intervention to improve family outcomes in the ICU. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012; 33(6):1245-54. PMC: 3823241. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.06.010. View

Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, Joly L, Chevret S, Adrie C . A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(5):469-78. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa063446. View

Ventureyra V, Cottraux J, Note I, de Mey-Guillard C . The validation of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Scale in posttraumatic stress disorder and nonclinical subjects. Psychother Psychosom. 2001; 71(1):47-53. DOI: 10.1159/000049343. View

10.

White D, Angus D, Shields A, Buddadhumaruk P, Pidro C, Paner C . A Randomized Trial of a Family-Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(25):2365-2375. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802637. View

11.

Douplat M, Fraticelli L, Claustre C, Peiretti A, Serre P, Bischoff M . Management of decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in French EDs. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020; 28(1):52. PMC: 7282105. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-020-00744-7. View

12.

Douplat M, Jacquin L, Tazarourte K, Michelet P, Le Coz P . Physicians' experience in decisions of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments: A multicenter survey into emergency departments. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018; 37(6):633-634. DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.09.007. View

13.

Archambault P, McGavin C, Dainty K, McLeod S, Vaillancourt C, Lee J . Recommendations for patient engagement in patient-oriented emergency medicine research. CJEM. 2018; 20(3):435-442. DOI: 10.1017/cem.2018.370. View

14.

Herrmann C . International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale--a review of validation data and clinical results. J Psychosom Res. 1997; 42(1):17-41. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00216-4. View

15.

Blackwell R, Carden D, Hess E, Booker-Vaughns J, Dunn P, Kizzie-Gillett C . Adapting Conceptual Frameworks for Patient Engagement in Emergency Department Research. Acad Emerg Med. 2016; 23(12):1332-1336. DOI: 10.1111/acem.13066. View

16.

Bocerean C, Dupret E . A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in a large sample of French employees. BMC Psychiatry. 2014; 14:354. PMC: 4476305. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-014-0354-0. View

17.

Douplat M, Berthiller J, Schott A, Potinet V, Le Coz P, Tazarourte K . Difficulty of the decision-making process in emergency departments for end-of-life patients. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019; 25(6):1193-1199. DOI: 10.1111/jep.13229. View

18.

Wiese C, Lassen C, Bartels U, Taghavi M, Elhabash S, Graf B . International recommendations for outpatient palliative care and prehospital palliative emergencies - a prospective questionnaire-based investigation. BMC Palliat Care. 2013; 12:10. PMC: 3602669. DOI: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-10. View

19.

Lincoln T, Shields A, Buddadhumaruk P, Chang C, Pike F, Chen H . Protocol for a randomised trial of an interprofessional team-delivered intervention to support surrogate decision-makers in ICUs. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(3):e033521. PMC: 7170558. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033521. View

20.

Curtis J, Treece P, Nielsen E, Gold J, Ciechanowski P, Shannon S . Randomized Trial of Communication Facilitators to Reduce Family Distress and Intensity of End-of-Life Care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015; 193(2):154-62. PMC: 4731711. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201505-0900OC. View