» Articles » PMID: 39235660

Cognitive Training During Midlife: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2024 Sep 5
PMID 39235660
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Midlife has been suggested to be a crucial time to introduce interventions for improving cognitive functions. The effects of cognitive training (CT) in healthy middle-aged populations and more specifically during the menopausal transition have not been systematically investigated. To investigate the effects of CT on cognition in healthy middle-aged adults and specifically in females during the menopause transition, literature was searched inception to July 2023 and studies were included that examined the effects of CT on a defined cognitive outcome. The improvement on cognitive performance following CT was the main outcome measured as mean difference (from baseline to immediate post) estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) in meta-analysis and was discussed with the support of subgroup analysis based on outcome type (i.e., far or near-transfer) and cluster tabulations. Nineteen articles were included in the qualitative synthesis with a total of 7765 individuals, and eight articles were included in the meta-analyses. CT was categorized into six type clusters: Game-based CT, General CT, Speed of Processing Training, Working Memory Training, Strategy-based CT, and Cognitive Remediation. Cognitive outcome was divided into six clusters: working memory, verbal memory, language, executive function, attention/processing speed, and visual memory. Meta-analysis reported significant improvement in the domain of executive function (0.48, 95% CI 0.08-0.87), verbal memory (0.22, 95% CI 0.11-0.33), and working memory (0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.26). CT confers benefits on various cognitive domains, suggesting a potential role of CT to promote optimal cognitive functioning in the midlife and specifically in women during the menopause transition.

References
1.
Ackerman P, Kanfer R, Calderwood C . Use it or lose it? Wii brain exercise practice and reading for domain knowledge. Psychol Aging. 2010; 25(4):753-66. PMC: 3000863. DOI: 10.1037/a0019277. View

2.
Akerlund E, Esbjornsson E, Sunnerhagen K, Bjorkdahl A . Can computerized working memory training improve impaired working memory, cognition and psychological health?. Brain Inj. 2013; 27(13-14):1649-57. DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2013.830195. View

3.
Anderson S, White-Schwoch T, Choi H, Kraus N . Partial maintenance of auditory-based cognitive training benefits in older adults. Neuropsychologia. 2014; 62:286-96. PMC: 4167577. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.034. View

4.
Bailey H, Dunlosky J, Hertzog C . Does strategy training reduce age-related deficits in working memory?. Gerontology. 2014; 60(4):346-56. PMC: 4074452. DOI: 10.1159/000356699. View

5.
Balduzzi S, Rucker G, Schwarzer G . How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evid Based Ment Health. 2019; 22(4):153-160. PMC: 10231495. DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117. View