A Systematic Review of Patient Outcomes for Primary Pediatric Flexor Tendon Repairs

Overview

Journal J Hand Microsurg

Date 2024 Sep 5

PMID 39234382

Authors

Minh Nq Huynh

Aneesh Karir

Patrick J Kim

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Literature on pediatric flexor tendon repairs remains sparse. Given the various repair techniques and rehabilitation protocols available, the aim of this systematic review is to investigate outcomes of primary pediatric flexor tendon repairs.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from inception to June 2022 in concordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if patients were under the age of 18, sustained a flexor tendon injury repaired primarily, and had documented functional outcomes. Quality assessment was completed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018089089).

Results: This study includes 20 articles representing 577 patients with 748 injured digits, most frequently injured by a laceration from glass. The number of tendon injuries in zones I, II, III, IV, and V were 78, 431, 62, 2, and 19, respectively. In total, 594 FDP, 374 FDS, and 77 FPL tendons were lacerated. Concurrent digital nerve injuries occurred in 251 digits. Time of repair was 15 h-187 days post-injury, most commonly via the modified Kessler (n = 266 digits) and Kessler (n = 162 digits). Post-operatively, 170 patients were immobilized and 261 patients underwent early active (n = 96) or passive (n = 165) protocols. Functional outcomes were reported in 466 digits (excellent = 306, good = 132, fair = 19, and poor = 9, per the respective assessment tool used). There were 15 tendon ruptures.

Conclusions: Despite heterogeneity in both operative and post-operative protocols, there is low level evidence that low complication rates and good outcomes are expected following primary repair of pediatric flexor tendons.

References

Chow J, Thomes L, Dovelle S, Milnor W, Seyfer A, Smith A . A combined regimen of controlled motion following flexor tendon repair in "no man's land". Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987; 79(3):447-55. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198703000-00025. View

Tuzuner S, Balci N, Ozkaynak S . Results of zone II flexor tendon repair in children younger than age 6 years: botulinum toxin type A administration eased cooperation during the rehabilitation and improved outcome. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004; 24(6):629-33. DOI: 10.1097/01241398-200411000-00006. View

Huynh M, Ghumman A, Agarwal A, Malic C . Outcomes After Flexor Tendon Injuries in the Pediatric Population: A 10-Year Retrospective Review. Hand (N Y). 2020; 17(2):278-284. PMC: 8984726. DOI: 10.1177/1558944720926651. View

Grobbelaar A, Hudson D . Flexor tendon injuries in children. J Hand Surg Br. 1994; 19(6):696-8. DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(94)90237-2. View

VAHVANEN V, GRIPENBERG L, Nuutinen P . Flexor tendon injury of the hand in children. A long-term follow-up study of 84 patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981; 15(1):43-8. DOI: 10.3109/02844318109103410. View

Starr H, Snoddy M, Hammond K, Seiler 3rd J . Flexor tendon repair rehabilitation protocols: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am. 2013; 38(9):1712-7.e1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.06.025. View

Orhun E, Polatkan S, Polatkan O, Nuzumlali E, Kantarci U . Repair of zone 2 flexor pollicis longus lacerations in children. J Hand Surg Br. 1999; 24(1):54-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(99)90029-3. View

Al-Qattan M . Zone I flexor profundus tendon repair in children 5-10 years of age using 3 "figure of eight" sutures followed by immediate active mobilization. Ann Plast Surg. 2011; 68(1):29-32. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31820e0e19. View

Strickland J . Management of acute flexor tendon injuries. Orthop Clin North Am. 1983; 14(4):827-49. View

10.

Strickland J, Glogovac S . Digital function following flexor tendon repair in Zone II: A comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 1980; 5(6):537-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(80)80101-8. View

11.

Nietosvaara Y, Lindfors N, Palmu S, Rautakorpi S, Ristaniemi N . Flexor tendon injuries in pediatric patients. J Hand Surg Am. 2007; 32(10):1549-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.08.006. View

12.

VERDAN C . Half a century of flexor-tendon surgery. Current status and changing philosophies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972; 54(3):472-91. View

13.

OConnell S, Moore M, Strickland J, Frazier G, Dell P . Results of zone I and zone II flexor tendon repairs in children. J Hand Surg Am. 1994; 19(1):48-52. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90223-2. View

14.

Stahl S, Kaufman T, Bialik V . Partial lacerations of flexor tendons in children. Primary repair versus conservative treatment. J Hand Surg Br. 1997; 22(3):377-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(97)80406-8. View

15.

Lin J, Balch Samora J . Functional outcomes of a modified Duran postoperative rehabilitation protocol after primary repairs of pediatric hand flexor tendon injuries. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2021; 31(6):597-602. DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000944. View

16.

Grobbelaar A, Hudson D . Flexor pollicis longus tendon injuries in children. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1995; 77(2):135-7. PMC: 2502136. View

17.

Winternitz Jr W, Kleven L, McElfresh E, House J . "Pumpkin carvers" tendon injuries: repair of children's flexor tendon lacerations caused by a sharp knife. Minn Med. 1988; 71(10):622-4. View

18.

Friedrich H, Baumel D . [The treatment of flexor tendon injuries in children]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2003; 35(6):347-52. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-44683. View

19.

Elhassan B, Moran S, Bravo C, Amadio P . Factors that influence the outcome of zone I and zone II flexor tendon repairs in children. J Hand Surg Am. 2006; 31(10):1661-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.09.003. View

20.

Al-Qattan M . A six-strand technique for zone II flexor-tendon repair in children younger than 2 years of age. Injury. 2011; 42(11):1262-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.003. View