» Articles » PMID: 39234298

Contact Load Practices and Perceptions in Elite English Rugby League: an Evaluation to Inform Contact Load Guidelines

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Sep 5
PMID 39234298
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Athlete exposure to contact could be a risk factor for injury. Governing bodies should provide guidelines preventing overexposure to contact.

Objectives: Describe the current contact load practices and perceptions of contact load requirements within men's and women's rugby league to allow the Rugby Football League (RFL) to develop contact load guidelines.

Methods: Participants (n=450 players, n=46 coaching staff, n=32 performance staff, n=23 medical staff) completed an online survey of 27 items, assessing the current contact load practices and perceptions within four categories: "current contact load practices" (n=12 items), "perceptions of required contact load" (n = 6 items), "monitoring of contact load" (n=3 items), and "the relationship between contact load and recovery" (n=6 items).

Results: During men's Super League pre-season, full contact and controlled contact training was typically undertaken for 15-30 minutes per week, and wrestling training for 15-45 minutes per week. During the in-season, these three training types were all typically undertaken for 15-30 mins per week. In women's Super League, all training modalities were undertaken for up to 30 minutes per week in the pre- and in-season periods. Both men's and women's Super League players and staff perceived 15-30 minutes of full contact training per week was enough to prepare players for the physical demands of rugby league, but a higher duration may be required to prepare for the technical contact demands.

Conclusion: Men's and women's Super League clubs currently undertake more contact training during pre-season than in-season, which was planned by coaches and is deemed adequate to prepare players for the demands of rugby league. This study provides data to develop contact load guidelines to improve player welfare whilst not impacting performance.

References
1.
McCall A, Wolfberg A, Ivarsson A, Dupont G, Larocque A, Bilsborough J . A Qualitative Study of 11 World-Class Team-Sport Athletes' Experiences Answering Subjective Questionnaires: A Key Ingredient for 'Visible' Health and Performance Monitoring?. Sports Med. 2023; 53(5):1085-1100. PMC: 10115681. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-023-01814-3. View

2.
Williams S, Kay E, Bryan R, Lambert M, Cross M, West S . The influence of match exposure on injury risk in elite men's rugby union. J Sci Med Sport. 2022; 26(1):25-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2022.10.016. View

3.
Rennie G, Weaving D, Hart B, Dalton-Barron N, Jones B . Tackle and ball carrier demands of rugby league: a seven-year league-wide study including over 1,000,000 tackle events. J Sci Med Sport. 2022; 25(10):850-854. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2022.07.002. View

4.
Hendricks S, Lambert M . Theoretical Model Describing the Relationship between the Number of Tackles in Which A Player Engages, Tackle Injury Risk and Tackle Performance. J Sports Sci Med. 2014; 13(3):715-7. PMC: 4126314. View

5.
Finch C . A new framework for research leading to sports injury prevention. J Sci Med Sport. 2006; 9(1-2):3-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.02.009. View