» Articles » PMID: 39233882

Systematic Review of Protective Factors Related to Academic Resilience in Children and Adolescents: Unpacking the Interplay of Operationalization, Data, and Research Method

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2024 Sep 5
PMID 39233882
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Identifying protective factors that promote academic resilience is vital. Nevertheless, due to the variations in the operationalizations of academic resilience, timeframes, data sources, and employed research methods, it remains unclear whether the impact of protective factors identified across studies can be attributed to the factors themselves or to these variations. By addressing these uncertainties, this study aims to provide an overview of the protective factors that have been extensively investigated in academic resilience and their degree of influence. A literature search found 119 empirical studies on protective factors in education settings for children and adolescents. The review analyzed five protective factors groups (individual, family, school, peer, community), three operationalizations of academic resilience (simultaneous, progressive, instrumental), two timeframes (longitudinal, non-longitudinal), three data sources (self-collected, national/local assessments, international large-scale assessments), and commonly employed research methods. The studies analyzed in this review yielded mixed results regarding the impact of the examined protective factors, with measurement instruments and statistical power playing a significant role in explaining the variations. Individual and school-level characteristics emerged as the most well-studied protective factors; individual characteristics were often investigated through "instrumental" operationalization and structural equational models, whereas school-level characteristics were typically explored through "simultaneous" or "progressive" operationalizations and multilevel modeling. Approximately 31 and 16% of the studies utilized national assessments and international large-scale assessment data, respectively. Both data sources promoted the exploration of school-level factors, with the former facilitating the exploration of protective factors across time and the latter contributing to the investigation of teaching-related factors.

Citing Articles

Study and personal resources of university students' academic resilience and the relationship with positive psychological outcomes.

Bagdziuniene D, Zukauskaite I, Bulotaite L, Sargautyte R Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1517359.

PMID: 39973962 PMC: 11835835. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1517359.

References
1.
Martin A, Colmar S, Davey L, Marsh H . Longitudinal modelling of academic buoyancy and motivation: do the '5Cs' hold up over time?. Br J Educ Psychol. 2010; 80(Pt 3):473-96. DOI: 10.1348/000709910X486376. View

2.
Armfield J, Ey L, Zufferey C, Gnanamanickam E, Segal L . Educational strengths and functional resilience at the start of primary school following child maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl. 2021; 122:105301. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105301. View

3.
Nichols E, Loper A, Meyer J . Promoting Educational Resiliency in Youth with Incarcerated Parents: The Impact of Parental Incarceration, School Characteristics, and Connectedness on School Outcomes. J Youth Adolesc. 2015; 45(6):1090-109. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-015-0337-6. View

4.
Oldfield J, Stevenson A, Ortiz E . Promoting resilience in street connected young people in Guatemala: The role of psychological and educational protective factors. J Community Psychol. 2019; 48(2):590-604. DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22272. View

5.
Kosciw J, Palmer N, Kull R . Reflecting resiliency: openness about sexual orientation and/or gender identity and its relationship to well-being and educational outcomes for LGBT students. Am J Community Psychol. 2014; 55(1-2):167-78. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-014-9642-6. View