» Articles » PMID: 39233560

Accuracy of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Staging Rectal Cancer Patients Proceeding Directly to Surgery

Overview
Journal J Surg Oncol
Date 2024 Sep 5
PMID 39233560
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) accuracy for staging preoperative rectal cancer varies across studies. We examined MRI accuracy for T- and N-staging of rectal cancer compared with final histopathology of the resected specimen in a large Australian cohort who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy or radiation.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively-collected clinical data from 153 rectal adenocarcinomas locally staged by high-resolution MRI between January 2012 and December 2019 that did not undergo chemoradiotherapy or radiation before surgery. T- and N-stage agreement between MRI and final histopathology was assessed using Kappa statistic. Agreement at each T-stage was evaluated using log-linear modeling. N-staging accuracy was examined using positive and negative predictive values.

Results: Overall agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T-stage and N-stage was 55% and 65%, respectively. Kappa statistic found higher agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T-staging (κ = 0.33) versus N-staging (κ = 0.18). MRI correctly assessed 91% of T1 tumors, 43% of T2 tumors, 65% of T3 tumors, and 80% of T4 tumors. MRI accuracy was higher for N-negative tumors (74.1%) than for N-positive tumors (44.4%).

Conclusion: MRI is moderately accurate at staging T1, T3, and T4 rectal tumors but caution when staging tumors as T2 is advised. Greater accuracy for staging N-negative versus N-positive tumors is indicated.

References
1.
Manfredi S, Benhamiche A, Meny B, Cheynel N, Rat P, Faivre J . Population-based study of factors influencing occurrence and prognosis of local recurrence after surgery for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2001; 88(9):1221-7. DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01861.x. View

2.
Pilipshen S, Heilweil M, Quan S, Sternberg S, Enker W . Patterns of pelvic recurrence following definitive resections of rectal cancer. Cancer. 1984; 53(6):1354-62. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840315)53:6<1354::aid-cncr2820530623>3.0.co;2-j. View

3.
Maclure M, Willett W . Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. Am J Epidemiol. 1987; 126(2):161-9. DOI: 10.1093/aje/126.2.161. View

4.
Piercey O, Wong H, Leung C, To Y, Heong V, Lee M . Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Older Patients With Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Analysis of Treatment Recommendations, Treatment Administered and Impact on Cancer Recurrence. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2024; 23(1):95-103.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2024.01.001. View

5.
Kasi A, Abbasi S, Handa S, Al-Rajabi R, Saeed A, Baranda J . Total Neoadjuvant Therapy vs Standard Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(12):e2030097. PMC: 7745099. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30097. View