6.
Liffner S, Pehrson I, Garcia-Calvo L, Nedstrand E, Zalavary S, Hammar M
. Diagnostics of DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa: Are sperm chromatin structure analysis and sperm chromatin dispersion tests (SCD-HaloSpermG2 ) comparable?. Andrologia. 2019; 51(8):e13316.
DOI: 10.1111/and.13316.
View
7.
Shingshetty L, Cameron N, McLernon D, Bhattacharya S
. Predictors of success after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2024; 121(5):742-751.
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.03.003.
View
8.
Lean S, Derricott H, Jones R, Heazell A
. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017; 12(10):e0186287.
PMC: 5645107.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186287.
View
9.
Austin P, Merlo J
. Intermediate and advanced topics in multilevel logistic regression analysis. Stat Med. 2017; 36(20):3257-3277.
PMC: 5575471.
DOI: 10.1002/sim.7336.
View
10.
Arvis P, Guivarch-Leveque A, Varlan E, Colella C, Lehert P
. [Predictive models for ART]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012; 42(1):12-20.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.10.003.
View
11.
Garrido N, Bellver J, Remohi J, Simon C, Pellicer A
. Cumulative live-birth rates per total number of embryos needed to reach newborn in consecutive in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles: a new approach to measuring the likelihood of IVF success. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96(1):40-6.
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.008.
View
12.
Garrido N, Bellver J, Remohi J, Alama P, Pellicer A
. Cumulative newborn rates increase with the total number of transferred embryos according to an analysis of 15,792 ovum donation cycles. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98(2):341-6.e1-2.
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.039.
View
13.
Cameron N, Bhattacharya S, McLernon D
. Cumulative live birth rates following blastocyst- versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first complete cycle of IVF: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2020; 35(10):2365-2374.
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa186.
View
14.
Drakopoulos P, Errazuriz J, Santos-Ribeiro S, Tournaye H, Vaiarelli A, Pluchino N
. Cumulative live birth rates in in-vitro fertilization. Minerva Ginecol. 2018; 71(3):207-210.
DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04347-2.
View
15.
Polyzos N, Drakopoulos P, Parra J, Pellicer A, Santos-Ribeiro S, Tournaye H
. Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ∼15,000 women. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110(4):661-670.e1.
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.039.
View
16.
Fanton M, Cho J, Baker V, Loewke K
. A higher number of oocytes retrieved is associated with an increase in fertilized oocytes, blastocysts, and cumulative live birth rates. Fertil Steril. 2023; 119(5):762-769.
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.01.001.
View
17.
Chen Y, Xu X, Wang Q, Zhang S, Jiang L, Zhang C
. Optimum oocyte retrieved and transfer strategy in young women with normal ovarian reserve undergoing a long treatment protocol: a retrospective cohort study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015; 32(10):1459-67.
PMC: 4615925.
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0571-6.
View
18.
Magnusson A, Kallen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Bergh C
. The number of oocytes retrieved during IVF: a balance between efficacy and safety. Hum Reprod. 2017; 33(1):58-64.
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex334.
View
19.
Steward R, Lan L, Shah A, Yeh J, Price T, Goldfarb J
. Oocyte number as a predictor for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and live birth: an analysis of 256,381 in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101(4):967-73.
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.026.
View
20.
Law Y, Zhang N, Kolibianakis E, Costello M, Keller E, Chambers G
. Is there an optimal number of oocytes retrieved at which live birth rates or cumulative live birth rates per aspiration are maximized after ART? A systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021; 42(1):83-104.
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.10.008.
View