» Articles » PMID: 39227487

Automated Condylar Seating Assessment Using a Deep Learning-based Three-step Approach

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 Sep 3
PMID 39227487
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: In orthognatic surgery, one of the primary determinants for reliable three-dimensional virtual surgery planning (3D VSP) and an accurate transfer of 3D VSP to the patient in the operation room is the condylar seating. Incorrectly seated condyles would primarily affect the accuracy of maxillary-first bimaxillary osteotomies as the maxillary repositioning is dependent on the positioning of the mandible in the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel tool by utilizing a deep learning algorithm that automatically evaluates the condylar seating based on CBCT images as a proof of concept.

Materials And Methods: As a reference, 60 CBCT scans (120 condyles) were labeled. The automatic assessment of condylar seating included three main parts: segmentation module, ray-casting, and feed-forward neural network (FFNN). The AI-based algorithm was trained and tested using fivefold cross validation. The method's performance was evaluated by comparing the labeled ground truth with the model predictions on the validation dataset.

Results: The model achieved an accuracy of 0.80, positive predictive value of 0.61, negative predictive value of 0.9 and F1-score of 0.71. The sensitivity and specificity of the model was 0.86 and 0.78, respectively. The mean AUC over all folds was 0.87.

Conclusion: The innovative integration of multi-step segmentation, ray-casting and a FFNN demonstrated to be a viable approach for automating condylar seating assessment and have obtained encouraging results.

Clinical Relevance: Automated condylar seating assessment using deep learning may improve orthognathic surgery, preventing errors and enhancing patient outcomes in maxillary-first bimaxillary osteotomies.

Citing Articles

Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular and condylar growth using artificial intelligence tools: a comparison of twin-block and Frankel II Appliances.

Shihabi R, Liu Y, Kusaibati A, Maraabeh F, Zhan J, Zhang J BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):254.

PMID: 39966790 PMC: 11837411. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05624-z.

References
1.
Stokbro K, Liebregts J, Baan F, Bell R, Maal T, Thygesen T . Does Mandible-First Sequencing Increase Maxillary Surgical Accuracy in Bimaxillary Procedures?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77(9):1882-1893. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.03.023. View

2.
Vinayahalingam S, Berends B, Baan F, Moin D, van Luijn R, Berge S . Deep learning for automated segmentation of the temporomandibular joint. J Dent. 2023; 132:104475. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104475. View

3.
Liebregts J, Baan F, de Koning M, Ongkosuwito E, Berge S, Maal T . Achievability of 3D planned bimaxillary osteotomies: maxilla-first versus mandible-first surgery. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):9314. PMC: 5571157. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09488-4. View

4.
Ko E, Lin C, Chen Y, Chen Y . Enhanced Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Skeletal Class III Facial Asymmetry by 3-Dimensional Surgical Simulation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 76(5):1073-1083. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.09.009. View

5.
Wan Y, Jackson T, Chung C, Gao F, Blakey G, Nguyen T . Comparison of condylar position in orthognathic surgery cases treated with virtual surgical planning vs. conventional model planning. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019; 22 Suppl 1:142-148. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12262. View