» Articles » PMID: 39223103

The Efficacy of Modified Ilizarov Distraction-Tension Device on Limb Wound Difficult to Cover with Skin Flaps

Overview
Journal Orthop Surg
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Sep 2
PMID 39223103
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Closure of complex limb wounds poses challenges and requires innovative approaches. This research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a modified distraction-tension device using Ilizarov external fixation for wound closure in challenging cases.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 43 patients with extremity wounds that were difficult to cover with skin flaps between January 2019 and December 2022. Tension-relieving traction was applied using the Ilizarovexternal fixator apparatus, tailored to individual wound characteristics. Three types of wire-pin connections were used in this study. The distraction begins on the third postoperative day, with a speed of 0.5mm/d. Clinical wound healing scores were evaluated at 5 and 30 days postoperatively. Complications were documented following the Paley classification system.

Results: Traction using modified Ilizarovexternal fixation promoted a significant reduction in wound size. The mean traction period was 11.2 ± 7.3 days, and the mean healing duration was 17.0 ± 3.7 days. The clinical wound healing score improved from 3.7 ± 2.9 at 5 days to 1.7 ± 0.7 at 30 days postoperatively (p < 0.05). Complications were minimal, with no significant obstacles or sequelae observed. Direct closure healing was achieved in 21 cases, skin graft healing in 13 cases, and suture healing in 9 cases. No recurrences were reported. Using Paley's classified complications, there were 17 problems, 9 obstacles, and 0 sequelae.

Conclusion: The Ilizarov tension-relieving traction shows promise in facilitating wound closure that is challenging to manage with skin flaps. The modified three types of pin-skin connection configuration could satisfy various types of wound closure.

Citing Articles

Limb Reconstruction-A New Paradigm in Orthopedic Development.

Qin S, Ma X, Du H Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(9):2109-2110.

PMID: 39556424 PMC: 11572570. DOI: 10.1111/os.14223.

References
1.
Yang D, Zhang P . Facial Resurfacing With Prefabricated Induced Expanded Skin Flap. J Craniofac Surg. 2019; 30(4):1131-1134. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005152. View

2.
Zhang Y, Hayakawa T, Levin L, Hallock G, Lazzeri D . The Economy in Autologous Tissue Transfer: Part 1. The Kiss Flap Technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 137(3):1018-1030. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000479971.99309.21. View

3.
Liu Z, Xu C, Yu Y, Tu D, Peng Y, Zhang B . Twenty Years Development of Tibial Cortex Transverse Transport Surgery in PR China. Orthop Surg. 2022; 14(6):1034-1048. PMC: 9163800. DOI: 10.1111/os.13214. View

4.
Shpichka A, Butnaru D, Bezrukov E, Sukhanov R, Atala A, Burdukovskii V . Skin tissue regeneration for burn injury. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019; 10(1):94. PMC: 6419807. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-019-1203-3. View

5.
Alga A, Haweizy R, Bashaireh K, Wong S, Lundgren K, von Schreeb J . Negative pressure wound therapy versus standard treatment in patients with acute conflict-related extremity wounds: a pragmatic, multisite, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2020; 8(3):e423-e429. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30547-9. View