» Articles » PMID: 39215217

The Reliability and Validity of Rapid Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Mapping for Muscles Under Active Contraction

Overview
Journal BMC Neurosci
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Aug 30
PMID 39215217
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rapid mapping is a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mapping method which can significantly reduce data collection time compared to traditional approaches. However, its validity and reliability has only been established for upper-limb muscles during resting-state activity. Here, we determined the validity and reliability of rapid mapping for non-upper limb muscles that require active contraction during TMS: the masseter and quadriceps muscles. Eleven healthy participants attended two sessions, spaced two hours apart, each involving rapid and 'traditional' mapping of the masseter muscle and three quadriceps muscles (rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis). Map parameters included map volume, map area and centre of gravity (CoG) in the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions. Low to moderate measurement errors (%SEM = 10-32) were observed across muscles. Relative reliability varied from good-to-excellent (ICC = 0.63-0.99) for map volume, poor-to-excellent (ICC = 0.11-0.86) for map area, and fair-to-excellent for CoG (ICC = 0.25-0.8) across muscles. There was Bayesian evidence of equivalence (BF's > 3) in most map outcomes between rapid and traditional maps across all muscles, supporting the validity of the rapid mapping method. Overall, rapid TMS mapping produced similar estimates of map parameters to the traditional method, however the reliability results were mixed. As mapping of non-upper limb muscles is relatively challenging, rapid mapping is a promising substitute for traditional mapping, however further work is required to refine this method.

References
1.
Tsao H, Danneels L, Hodges P . ISSLS prize winner: Smudging the motor brain in young adults with recurrent low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(21):1721-7. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821c4267. View

2.
Guggisberg A, Dubach P, Hess C, Wuthrich C, Mathis J . Motor evoked potentials from masseter muscle induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the pyramidal tract: the importance of coil orientation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001; 112(12):2312-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00677-0. View

3.
Chang W, Bennell K, Hodges P, Hinman R, Liston M, Schabrun S . Combined exercise and transcranial direct current stimulation intervention for knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(8):e008482. PMC: 4550738. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008482. View

4.
Richter L, Neumann G, Oung S, Schweikard A, Trillenberg P . Optimal coil orientation for transcranial magnetic stimulation. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e60358. PMC: 3623976. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060358. View

5.
Chowdhury N, Chang W, Millard S, Skippen P, Bilska K, Seminowicz D . The Effect of Acute and Sustained Pain on Corticomotor Excitability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Group and Individual Level Data. J Pain. 2022; 23(10):1680-1696. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.04.012. View