» Articles » PMID: 39213065

A Comparison of an Australian Observational Longitudinal Alzheimer's Disease Cohort to Community-Based Australian Data

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialties Geriatrics
Neurology
Date 2024 Aug 30
PMID 39213065
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Observational Alzheimer's disease (AD) cohorts including the Australian, Biomarkers, Imaging and Lifestyle (AIBL) Study have enhanced our understanding of AD. The generalizability of findings from AIBL to the general population has yet to be studied.

Objective: We aimed to compare characteristics of people with AD dementia in AIBL to 1) the general population of older Australians using pharmacological treatment for AD dementia, and to 2) the general population of older Australians who self-reported a diagnosis of dementia.

Methods: Descriptive study comparing people aged 65 years of over (1) in AIBL that had a diagnosis of AD dementia, (2) dispensed with pharmacological treatment for AD in Australia in 2021 linked to the Australian census in 2021 (refer to as PBS/census), (3) self-reported a diagnosis of dementia in the 2021 Australian census (refer to as dementia/census). Baseline characteristics included age, sex, highest education attainment, primary language, and medical co-morbidities.

Results: Participants in AIBL were younger, had more years of education, and had a lower culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) population compared to the PBS/census cohort and dementia/census cohort (mean age±standard deviation - AIBL 79±7 years, PBS/census 81±7, p < 0.001, dementia/census 83±8, p < 0.001; greater than 12 years of education AIBL 40%, PBS/census 35%, p = 0.020, dementia/census 29%, p < 0.001; CALD - AIBL 3%, PBS/census 20%, p < 0.001, dementia/census 22%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that care should be taken regarding the generalizability of AIBL in CALD populations and the interpretation of results on the natural history of AD.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of the Florey Dementia Risk Score web-based tool to screen for Alzheimer's disease in primary care.

Pan Y, Chu C, Wang Y, Wang Y, Ji G, Masters C EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 76:102834.

PMID: 39328810 PMC: 11426130. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102834.

References
1.
Guillemin M, Gillam L, Barnard E, Stewart P, Walker H, Rosenthal D . "We're checking them out": Indigenous and non-Indigenous research participants' accounts of deciding to be involved in research. Int J Equity Health. 2016; 15:8. PMC: 4715344. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-016-0301-4. View

2.
Gianattasio K, Bennett E, Wei J, Mehrotra M, Mosley T, Gottesman R . Generalizability of findings from a clinical sample to a community-based sample: A comparison of ADNI and ARIC. Alzheimers Dement. 2021; 17(8):1265-1276. PMC: 8359773. DOI: 10.1002/alz.12293. View

3.
Low L, Barcenilla-Wong A, Brijnath B . Including ethnic and cultural diversity in dementia research. Med J Aust. 2019; 211(8):345-346.e1. DOI: 10.5694/mja2.50353. View

4.
Dubois B, Feldman H, Jacova C, Hampel H, Molinuevo J, Blennow K . Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2014; 13(6):614-29. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0. View

5.
Lang L, Clifford A, Wei L, Zhang D, Leung D, Augustine G . Prevalence and determinants of undetected dementia in the community: a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(2):e011146. PMC: 5293981. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011146. View