Community Voices from Modern Maternal Waiting Home Users in Zambia

Overview

Journal Front Glob Womens Health

Specialty Public Health

Date 2024 Aug 30

PMID 39211345

Authors

Melvin Kunda Mwansa

Kafiswe Chimpinde

Mergan Naidoo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to understand community voices on factors influencing utilisation of MMWHs in Zambia.

Methods: The study employed a mixed method study design in four selected health facilities across Zambia districts between January 2021 and December 2022. Purposeful sampling was used to select study participants using MMWH registers as the sampling frame for mothers who had utilised MMWHs and their spouses. Sampling of participants through face-to-face, in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) was conducted to saturation in all targeted health facilities Data was transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.

Results: Results found that the comfortable state of the MMWHs, long distances to health facilities, fear of maternal complications, availability and positive attitudes of specialized health personnel, and the information on childcare provided were major factors. Spouses supported their partners using MMWHs due to the quality of care and the availability of modern equipment and furniture. However, some spouses indicated that utilisation of MMWHs has a bearing on a household's financial resources.

Conclusion: MMWHs are a pivotal intervention in improving maternal outcomes. All health facilities had no maternal and newborn complications or deaths over the study period.

References

Scott N, Vian T, Kaiser J, Ngoma T, Mataka K, Henry E . Listening to the community: Using formative research to strengthen maternity waiting homes in Zambia. PLoS One. 2018; 13(3):e0194535. PMC: 5854412. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194535. View

Sialubanje C, Massar K, Hamer D, Ruiter R . Personal and environmental factors associated with the utilisation of maternity waiting homes in rural Zambia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(1):136. PMC: 5418767. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1317-5. View

Sialubanje C, Massar K, Hamer D, Ruiter R . Reasons for home delivery and use of traditional birth attendants in rural Zambia: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15:216. PMC: 4567794. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-015-0652-7. View

Belachew T, Bihonegn Asmamaw D, Negash W . Short birth interval and its predictors among reproductive age women in high fertility countries in sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel analysis of recent Demographic and Health Surveys. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):81. PMC: 9885595. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05403-0. View

Tayebwa E, Gatimu S, Kalisa R, Kim Y, van Dillen J, Stekelenburg J . Provider and client perspectives on the use of maternity waiting homes in rural Rwanda. Glob Health Action. 2023; 16(1):2210881. PMC: 10190178. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2210881. View

Molla M, Tesfa M, Alle A, Molla F, Aschale A, Endalew B . Effect of maternity waiting homes use on maternal and perinatal birth outcomes and its challenges in Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia. Front Glob Womens Health. 2023; 3:978486. PMC: 9848737. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.978486. View

Konlan K, Saah J, Amoah R, Doat A, Mohammed I, Abdulai J . Factors influencing the utilization of Focused antenatal care services during pregnancy, a study among postnatal women in a tertiary healthcare facility, Ghana. Nurs Open. 2020; 7(6):1822-1832. PMC: 7544877. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.569. View

Sialubanje C, Massar K, van der Pijl M, Kirch E, Hamer D, Ruiter R . Improving access to skilled facility-based delivery services: Women's beliefs on facilitators and barriers to the utilisation of maternity waiting homes in rural Zambia. Reprod Health. 2015; 12:61. PMC: 4493824. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-015-0051-6. View

Suwedi-Kapesa L, Nyondo-Mipando A . Assessment of the quality of care in Maternity Waiting Homes (MWHs) in Mulanje District, Malawi. Malawi Med J. 2019; 30(2):103-110. PMC: 6307072. DOI: 10.4314/mmj.v30i2.10. View

10.

Eckermann E, Deodato G . Maternity waiting homes in Southern Lao PDR: the unique 'silk home'. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008; 34(5):767-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00924.x. View

11.

Mannava P, Durrant K, Fisher J, Chersich M, Luchters S . Attitudes and behaviours of maternal health care providers in interactions with clients: a systematic review. Global Health. 2015; 11:36. PMC: 4537564. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-015-0117-9. View

12.

Vermeiden T, Braat F, Medhin G, Gaym A, van den Akker T, Stekelenburg J . Factors associated with intended use of a maternity waiting home in Southern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1):38. PMC: 5775531. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1670-z. View

13.

Gurara M, Jacquemyn Y, Ukke G, Van Geertruyden J, Draulans V . Benefits, barriers and enablers of maternity waiting homes utilization in Ethiopia: an integrative review of national implementation experience to date. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1):675. PMC: 9438264. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04954-y. View

14.

Sialubanje C, Massar K, Kirch E, van der Pijl M, Hamer D, Ruiter R . Husbands' experiences and perceptions regarding the use of maternity waiting homes in rural Zambia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016; 133(1):108-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.08.023. View