» Articles » PMID: 39205315

Kinetic Landscape of Single Virus-like Particles Highlights the Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Internalization

Overview
Journal Viruses
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2024 Aug 29
PMID 39205315
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The efficiency of virus internalization into target cells is a major determinant of infectivity. SARS-CoV-2 internalization occurs via S-protein-mediated cell binding followed either by direct fusion with the plasma membrane or endocytosis and subsequent fusion with the endosomal membrane. Despite the crucial role of virus internalization, the precise kinetics of the processes involved remains elusive. We developed a pipeline, which combines live-cell microscopy and advanced image analysis, for measuring the rates of multiple internalization-associated molecular events of single SARS-CoV-2-virus-like particles (VLPs), including endosome ingression and pH change. Our live-cell imaging experiments demonstrate that only a few minutes after binding to the plasma membrane, VLPs ingress into RAP5-negative endosomes via dynamin-dependent scission. Less than two minutes later, VLP speed increases in parallel with a pH drop below 5, yet these two events are not interrelated. By co-imaging fluorescently labeled nucleocapsid proteins, we show that nucleocapsid release occurs with similar kinetics to VLP acidification. Neither Omicron mutations nor abrogation of the S protein polybasic cleavage site affected the rate of VLP internalization, indicating that they do not confer any significant advantages or disadvantages during this process. Finally, we observe that VLP internalization occurs two to three times faster in VeroE6 than in A549 cells, which may contribute to the greater susceptibility of the former cell line to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Taken together, our precise measurements of the kinetics of VLP internalization-associated processes shed light on their contribution to the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 propagation in cells.

Citing Articles

In and out of Replication Stress: PCNA/RPA1-Based Dynamics of Fork Stalling and Restart in the Same Cell.

Dyankova-Danovska T, Uzunova S, Danovski G, Stamatov R, Kanev P, Atemin A Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(2.

PMID: 39859385 PMC: 11765805. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26020667.

References
1.
Prichard K, OBrien N, Murcia S, Baker J, McCluskey A . Role of Clathrin and Dynamin in Clathrin Mediated Endocytosis/Synaptic Vesicle Recycling and Implications in Neurological Diseases. Front Cell Neurosci. 2022; 15:754110. PMC: 8805674. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2021.754110. View

2.
Stimac I, Jug Vucko N, Blagojevic Zagorac G, Marcelic M, Mahmutefendic Lucin H, Lucin P . Dynamin Inhibitors Prevent the Establishment of the Cytomegalovirus Assembly Compartment in the Early Phase of Infection. Life (Basel). 2021; 11(9). PMC: 8469281. DOI: 10.3390/life11090876. View

3.
Vkovski P, Kratzel A, Steiner S, Stalder H, Thiel V . Coronavirus biology and replication: implications for SARS-CoV-2. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020; 19(3):155-170. PMC: 7592455. DOI: 10.1038/s41579-020-00468-6. View

4.
Cocucci E, Gaudin R, Kirchhausen T . Dynamin recruitment and membrane scission at the neck of a clathrin-coated pit. Mol Biol Cell. 2014; 25(22):3595-609. PMC: 4230619. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E14-07-1240. View

5.
Antonny B, Burd C, De Camilli P, Chen E, Daumke O, Faelber K . Membrane fission by dynamin: what we know and what we need to know. EMBO J. 2016; 35(21):2270-2284. PMC: 5090216. DOI: 10.15252/embj.201694613. View