» Articles » PMID: 39203978

A Structured Narrative Literature Review of the Broader Value of Adult Immunisation Programmes

Overview
Date 2024 Aug 29
PMID 39203978
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Vaccine-preventable diseases continue to generate a substantial burden on health, healthcare systems, and societies, which is projected to increase with population ageing. There is a need to better understand the full value of adult immunisation programmes corresponding to the broader value of vaccine frameworks that are recommended for evidence-based decision-making. This review aims to summarise and map evidence for the value of selected adult immunisation programmes (seasonal influenza, pneumococcal disease, RSV, and HZ) in ten diverse countries. We conducted a structured literature review of evidence published from 2017 to 2023. An existing framework was used to structure the assessment, developing matrices demonstrating the elements of value evidenced for each vaccine and country of focus. Our analysis showed substantial evidence base on the value of adult immunisation programmes, but the availability of evidence varied by value element and by vaccine. The impact on the quality of life of the vaccinated individual was the most evidenced value element. Mortality benefits for vaccinated individuals and cost-offsets to healthcare systems were also well-evidenced. The availability of evidence for 'broader' societal value elements (such as transmission value, carer productivity and impact on social equity, and antimicrobial resistance prevention) varied. No evidence was identified relating to the broader value elements of macroeconomic effects, value to other interventions, or effects on the quality of life of caregivers. Robust evidence exists to show that adult immunisation programmes generate substantial value for population health and health systems, yet some elements of broader value remain underrepresented in the academic literature. Without such evidence, the full value of immunisation programmes is underestimated, risking suboptimal policy decisions.

Citing Articles

.

Calabro G, Rizzo C, Domnich A, de Waure C, Rumi F, Bonanni P J Prev Med Hyg. 2024; 65(2 Suppl 1):E1-E159.

PMID: 39554593 PMC: 11567645. DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2024.65.2s1.

References
1.
Klugman K, Black S . Impact of existing vaccines in reducing antibiotic resistance: Primary and secondary effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(51):12896-12901. PMC: 6304973. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1721095115. View

2.
Postma M, Biundo E, Chicoye A, Devlin N, Doherty T, Garcia-Ruiz A . Capturing the value of vaccination within health technology assessment and health economics: Country analysis and priority value concepts. Vaccine. 2022; 40(30):3999-4007. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.026. View

3.
Wateska A, Nowalk M, Lin C, Harrison L, Schaffner W, Zimmerman R . Cost-effectiveness of revised US pneumococcal vaccination recommendations in underserved minority adults < 65-years-old. Vaccine. 2022; 40(50):7312-7320. PMC: 9999373. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.066. View

4.
Gessner B, Kaslow D, Louis J, Neuzil K, OBrien K, Picot V . Estimating the full public health value of vaccination. Vaccine. 2017; 35(46):6255-6263. PMC: 11369760. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.048. View

5.
Burns P, Rohrich R, Chung K . The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128(1):305-310. PMC: 3124652. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171. View