» Articles » PMID: 39203552

Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Properties of Native Australian Plant Endophytes Against Wound-Infecting Bacteria

Overview
Journal Microorganisms
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2024 Aug 29
PMID 39203552
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The wound management field faces significant challenges due to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the complexity of chronic wound care. Effective wound treatment requires antimicrobial dressings to prevent bacterial infections. However, the rise of AMR necessitates new antimicrobial agents for wound dressings, particularly for addressing bacterial pathogens like methicillin-resistant (MRSA). Endophytic fungi, known for producing diverse bioactive compounds, represent a promising source of such new agents. This study tested thirty-two endophytic fungi from thirteen distinct Australian native plants for their antibacterial activity against . Ethyl acetate (EtOAc) extracts from fungal culture filtrates exhibited inhibitory effects against both methicillin-sensitive ATCC 25923 (MIC = 78.1 µg/mL) and MRSA M180920 (MIC = 78.1 µg/mL). DNA sequence analysis was employed for fungal identification. The most active sample, EL 19 (), was selected for further analysis, revealing that its EtOAc extracts reduced ATCC 25923 biofilm formation by 55% and cell viability by 57% to 68% at 12 × MIC. Furthermore, cytotoxicity studies using the brine shrimp lethality test demonstrated low cytotoxicity up to 6 × MIC (25% mortality rate) with an LC50 value of 639.1 µg/mL. Finally, the most active sample was incorporated into polycaprolactone (PCL) fiber mats via electrospinning, with resultant inhibition of species. This research underscores the potential of endophytic fungi from Australian plants as sources of substances effective against common wound pathogens. Further exploration of the responsible compounds and their mechanisms could facilitate the development of wound dressings effective against MRSA and innovative biofilm-resistant electrospun fibers, contributing to the global efforts to combat AMR.

References
1.
Wu H, Moser C, Wang H, Hoiby N, Song Z . Strategies for combating bacterial biofilm infections. Int J Oral Sci. 2014; 7(1):1-7. PMC: 4817533. DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2014.65. View

2.
Guglielmi P, Pontecorvi V, Rotondi G . Natural compounds and extracts as novel antimicrobial agents. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2020; 30(12):949-962. DOI: 10.1080/13543776.2020.1853101. View

3.
Garcia-Salinas S, Evangelopoulos M, Gamez-Herrera E, Arruebo M, Irusta S, Taraballi F . Electrospun anti-inflammatory patch loaded with essential oils for wound healing. Int J Pharm. 2020; 577:119067. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119067. View

4.
Archer N, Mazaitis M, Costerton J, Leid J, Powers M, Shirtliff M . Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation, and roles in human disease. Virulence. 2011; 2(5):445-59. PMC: 3322633. DOI: 10.4161/viru.2.5.17724. View

5.
Andrews J . Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001; 48 Suppl 1:5-16. DOI: 10.1093/jac/48.suppl_1.5. View