» Articles » PMID: 39202573

Which Position for Novice Surgeons? Effect of Supine and Prone Positions on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Learning Curve

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Aug 29
PMID 39202573
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a current treatment method with high success rates and low complication rates in treating large kidney stones. It can be conducted in different positions, especially supine and prone positions. PCNL in the supine position is becoming increasingly common due to its advantages, such as simultaneous retrograde intervention and better anesthesia management. This study aimed to assess how the choice of position impacts the PCNL learning curve. : The results of the first 50 consecutive PCNL cases performed by two separate chief residents as primary surgeons in supine and prone positions in a reference center for stone treatment between August 2021 and January 2023 were evaluated. The two groups' demographic and clinical data, stone-free rates, operation times, and fluoroscopy times were compared. : While the mean operation time was 94.6 ± 9.8 min in the supine PCNL group, it was 129.9 ± 20.3 min in the prone PCNL group ( < 0.001). Median fluoroscopy times in the supine PCNL and prone PCNL groups were 31 (10-89) seconds and 48 (23-156) seconds, respectively ( = 0.001). During the operation, the plateau was reached after the 10th case in the supine PCNL group, while it was reached after the 40th case in the prone PCNL group. : For surgeons who are novices in performing PCNL, supine PCNL may offer both better results and a faster learning curve. Prospective and randomized studies can provide more robust conclusions on this subject.

References
1.
Keller E, De Coninck V, Proietti S, Talso M, Emiliani E, Ploumidis A . Prone versus supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2020; 73(1):50-58. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.03960-0. View

2.
Allen D, OBrien T, Tiptaft R, Glass J . Defining the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2005; 19(3):279-82. DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.279. View

3.
Tanriverdi O, Boylu U, Kendirci M, Kadihasanoglu M, Horasanli K, Miroglu C . The learning curve in the training of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007; 52(1):206-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.001. View

4.
Walick K, Kragh Jr J, Ward J, Crawford J . Changes in intraocular pressure due to surgical positioning: studying potential risk for postoperative vision loss. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(23):2591-5. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158cc23. View

5.
Melo P, Vicentini F, Perrella R, Murta C, de Almeida Claro J . Comparative study of percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed in the traditional prone position and in three different supine positions. Int Braz J Urol. 2018; 45(1):108-117. PMC: 6442131. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0191. View