» Articles » PMID: 39202515

Combined Statistical Analysis of Glioblastoma Outcomes-A Neurosurgical Single-Institution Retrospective Study

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Aug 29
PMID 39202515
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Notwithstanding the major progress in the management of cancerous diseases in the last few decades, glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most aggressive brain malignancy, with a dismal prognosis, mainly due to treatment resistance and tumoral recurrence. In order to diagnose this disease and establish the optimal therapeutic approach to it, a standard tissue biopsy or a liquid biopsy can be performed, although the latter is currently less common. To date, both tissue and liquid biopsy have yielded numerous biomarkers that predict the evolution and response to treatment in GBM. However, despite all such efforts, GBM has the shortest recorded survival rates of all the primary brain malignancies. : We retrospectively reviewed patients with a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of glioblastoma between June 2011 and June 2023. All the patients were treated in the Third Neurosurgical Department of the Clinical Emergency Hospital "Bagdasar-Arseni" in Bucharest, and their outcomes were analyzed and presented accordingly. : Out of 518 patients in our study, 222 (42.8%) were women and 296 (57.14%) were men. The most common clinical manifestations were headaches and limb paralysis, while the most frequent tumor locations were the frontal and temporal lobes. The survival rates were prolonged in patients younger than 60 years of age, in patients with gross total tumoral resection and less than 30% tumoral necrosis, as well as in those who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. : Despite significant advancements in relation to cancer diseases, GBM is still a field of great interest for research and in great need of new therapeutic approaches. Although the multimodal therapeutic approach can improve the prognosis, the survival rates are still short and the recurrences are constant.

References
1.
Ohgaki H, Dessen P, Jourde B, Horstmann S, Nishikawa T, Di Patre P . Genetic pathways to glioblastoma: a population-based study. Cancer Res. 2004; 64(19):6892-9. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1337. View

2.
Heuer S, Winkler F . Glioblastoma revisited: from neuronal-like invasion to pacemaking. Trends Cancer. 2023; 9(11):887-896. DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2023.07.009. View

3.
Torp S, Solheim O, Skjulsvik A . The WHO 2021 Classification of Central Nervous System tumours: a practical update on what neurosurgeons need to know-a minireview. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022; 164(9):2453-2464. PMC: 9427889. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-022-05301-y. View

4.
Lin Z, Yang R, Li K, Yi G, Li Z, Guo J . Establishment of age group classification for risk stratification in glioma patients. BMC Neurol. 2020; 20(1):310. PMC: 7439690. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-01888-w. View

5.
Karschnia P, Young J, Dono A, Hani L, Sciortino T, Bruno F . Prognostic validation of a new classification system for extent of resection in glioblastoma: A report of the RANO resect group. Neuro Oncol. 2022; 25(5):940-954. PMC: 10158281. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac193. View