» Articles » PMID: 39202291

Classification of Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Proposal for Revision

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Aug 29
PMID 39202291
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Establishing universal standards for the nomenclature and classification of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy is essential. This review summarizes the classifications used for categorizing the patterns of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy and grading its severity in the literature, highlighting the limitations of these classifications based on recent findings. To overcome these limitations, I propose categorizing hydroxychloroquine retinopathy into four categories based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings: parafoveal (parafoveal damage only), pericentral (pericentral damage only), combined parafoveal and pericentral (both parafoveal and pericentral damage), and posterior polar (widespread damage over parafoveal, pericentral, and more peripheral areas), with or without foveal involvement. Alternatively, eyes can be categorized simply into parafoveal and pericentral retinopathy based on the most dominant area of damage, rather than the topographic distribution of overall retinal damage. Furthermore, I suggest a five-stage modified version of the current three-stage grading system of disease severity based on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) as follows: 0, no hyperautofluorescence (normal); 1, localized parafoveal or pericentral hyperautofluorescence on FAF; 2, hyperautofluorescence extending greater than 180° around the fovea; 3, combined retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) defects (hypoautofluorescence on FAF) without foveal involvement; and 4, fovea-involving hypoautofluorescence. These classification systems can better address the topographic characteristics of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy using disease patterns and assess the risk of vision-threatening retinopathy by stage, particularly with foveal involvement.

References
1.
Rempenault C, Combe B, Barnetche T, Gaujoux-Viala C, Lukas C, Morel J . Clinical and Structural Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019; 72(1):36-40. DOI: 10.1002/acr.23826. View

2.
De Sisternes L, Hu J, Rubin D, Marmor M . Localization of damage in progressive hydroxychloroquine retinopathy on and off the drug: inner versus outer retina, parafovea versus peripheral fovea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56(5):3415-26. PMC: 4455312. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-16345. View

3.
Anderson C, Blaha G, Marx J . Humphrey visual field findings in hydroxychloroquine toxicity. Eye (Lond). 2011; 25(12):1535-45. PMC: 3234480. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.245. View

4.
Marmor M, Durbin M, De Sisternes L, Pham B . SEQUENTIAL RETINAL THICKNESS ANALYSIS SHOWS HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE DAMAGE BEFORE OTHER SCREENING TECHNIQUES. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2021; 15(3):185-196. DOI: 10.1097/ICB.0000000000001108. View

5.
Ahn S, Seo E, Kim K, Kim Y, Lee B, Kim J . Long-Term Progression of Pericentral Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2020; 128(6):889-898. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.029. View