» Articles » PMID: 39202036

Emergency Awake Laparotomy Using Neuraxial Anaesthesia: A Case Series and Literature Review

Abstract

Emergency laparotomy is a surgical procedure associated with significantly higher mortality rates compared to elective surgeries. Awake laparotomy under neuraxial anaesthesia has recently emerged as a promising approach in abdominal surgery to improve patient outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits of using neuraxial anaesthesia as the primary anaesthetic technique in emergency laparotomies. We conducted a case series involving 16 patients who underwent emergency laparotomy for bowel ischemia, perforation, or occlusion. Neuraxial anaesthesia was employed as the main anaesthetic technique. We analysed patient demographics, clinical characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes. The primary outcome measures included the adequacy of postoperative pain control, the incidence of postoperative complications, and mortality rates. Among the 16 patients, adequate postoperative pain control was achieved, with only 2 patients requiring additional analgesia. Postoperative complications, including sepsis, wound dehiscence, and pneumonia, were observed in seven patients (44%). The observed mortality rate was relatively low at 6% (one patient). Notably, conversion to general anaesthesia was not necessary in any of the cases, and no early readmissions were reported. Our findings highlight the feasibility and potential benefits of using neuraxial anaesthesia in emergency laparotomies. The observed low mortality rate and the avoidance of conversion to general anaesthesia suggest that neuraxial anaesthesia may be a useful alternative in emergency settings. However, the occurrence of postoperative complications in 44% of patients indicates the need for cautious patient selection and close monitoring. Further research with larger sample sizes is warranted to fully elucidate the efficacy, safety, and potential impact of this technique on patient outcomes in emergency laparotomies.

References
1.
Shen Q, Li H, Zhou X, Yuan X, Lu Y . Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant for single spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section: a system review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2020; 48(5):300060520913423. PMC: 7263150. DOI: 10.1177/0300060520913423. View

2.
Usta B, Gozdemir M, Demircioglu R, Muslu B, Sert H, Yaldiz A . Dexmedetomidine for the prevention of shivering during spinal anesthesia. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011; 66(7):1187-91. PMC: 3148462. DOI: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000700011. View

3.
Major A, Jumaniyazov K, Yusupova S, Jabbarov R, Saidmamatov O, Mayboroda-Major I . Removal of a Giant Cyst of the Left Ovary from a Pregnant Woman in the First Trimester by Laparoscopic Surgery under Spinal Anesthesia during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Med Sci (Basel). 2021; 9(4). PMC: 8628878. DOI: 10.3390/medsci9040070. View

4.
Palomero Rodriguez M, Mencia T, Villar Alvarez F, Laporta Baez Y, Perez G, Garcia A . Low-dose spinal anesthesia for urgent laparotomy in severe myasthenia gravis. Saudi J Anaesth. 2013; 7(1):90-2. PMC: 3657936. DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.109836. View

5.
Gritsenko K, Marcello D, Liguori G, Jules-Elysee K, Memtsoudis S . Meningitis or epidural abscesses after neuraxial block for removal of infected hip or knee prostheses. Br J Anaesth. 2011; 108(3):485-90. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer416. View