» Articles » PMID: 39202017

Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, Prone, and Supine Positions

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2024 Aug 29
PMID 39202017
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study, intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured in sitting, supine, prone, and standing (ST) positions and again five minutes after standing (ST-5) utilizing a Tono-Pen AVIA in 124 eyes of 62 healthy subjects with ages ranging from 21 to 59 years (mean 30 ± 10 years). In each subject, the average IOP of both eyes was used for the statistical evaluation. The mean IOP difference between the ST and sitting positions was -0.13 ± 1.63 mmHg ( = 0.548); between ST-5 and sitting, it was 0.53 ± 1.24 mmHg ( = 0.001); between supine and sitting, it was 1.30 ± 1.48 mmHg ( < 0.001); between ST and supine, it was -1.43 ± 1.74 mmHg ( < 0.001); between ST-5 and supine, it was -0.77 ± 1.59 mmHg ( < 0.001); between prone and supine, it was 2.24 ± 1.92 mmHg ( < 0.001); between ST and ST-5, it was -0.67 ± 1.84 mmHg (range: -7.5 to 5 mmHg) ( = 0.007); between prone and ST, it was 3.46 ± 2.01 mmHg ( < 0.001); between ST-5 and prone, it was -2.46 ± 1.67 mmHg ( < 0.001); and between sitting and prone, it was -3.22 ± 1.56 mmHg ( < 0.001). The results show a significant IOP increase in the ST-5 position, suggesting that such measurements need to be performed in an attempt to explain the progression of glaucoma in apparently normal-tension patients.

Citing Articles

Optimal Timing for Intraocular Pressure Measurement Following Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis.

Herspiegel W, Yu B, Algodi H, Malvankar-Mehta M, Hutnik C Vision (Basel). 2024; 8(4).

PMID: 39585115 PMC: 11587468. DOI: 10.3390/vision8040065.

References
1.
Mayali H, Tekin B, Kayikcioglu O, Kurt E, Ilker S . Evaluation of the Effect of Body Position on Intraocular Pressure Measured with Rebound Tonometer. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2019; 49(1):6-9. PMC: 6416475. DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2018.90359. View

2.
Sobczak M, Asejczyk M, Geniusz M . Does body position, age, and heart rate induce IOP's changes?. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021; 32(3):1530-1537. DOI: 10.1177/11206721211023313. View

3.
Rosa N, De Bernardo M, Pepe A, Vitiello L, Marotta G, Imparato R . Corneal thickness evaluation in healthy eyes: Comparison between two different Scheimpflug devices. PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0243370. PMC: 7714349. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243370. View

4.
Buys Y, Alasbali T, Jin Y, Smith M, Gouws P, Geffen N . Effect of sleeping in a head-up position on intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117(7):1348-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.11.015. View

5.
Chen M, Zhang L, Xu J, Chen X, Gu Y, Ren Y . Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019; 19(1):225. PMC: 6857285. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-019-1236-5. View