» Articles » PMID: 39202010

Prostate Cancer Screening in Young Men

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2024 Aug 29
PMID 39202010
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) screening strategies are being developed and evaluated in several countries. However, most of the evidence regarding PCa screening has been generated in study populations aged 50 and older. This study summarizes findings of a screening trial in younger men and discuss those findings in the context of other screening trials. Non-systematic review. Screening of 45-year-old men resulted in a low PCa detection rate. Nonetheless, almost 70% of screen-detected PCa at this age was clinically significant. In young men ISUP GG 1 screen-detected cancers warrant rigorous follow-up. A baseline, midlife prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value at age 45 may safely exclude the vast majority of men from further screening investigations for at least 5 years. At age 45, a confirmatory PSA value reduces the number of subsequent tests almost by half. Sequential magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a reflex test subsequent to an elevated PSA ≥ 3 ng/mL needs further investigation in young men. Screening in young men needs to be carefully investigated in order to avoid overscreening and overdiagnosis.

Citing Articles

Tumor characteristics, treatments, and oncological outcomes of prostate cancer in men aged ≤60 years: real-world data from a single urological center over a 10-year period.

Liu W, Guo S, Xiao X, Wang Y, Liu R, Wang N Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(11):2408-2418.

PMID: 39698579 PMC: 11650359. DOI: 10.21037/tau-24-410.

References
1.
de Vos I, Meertens A, Hogenhout R, Remmers S, Roobol M . A Detailed Evaluation of the Effect of Prostate-specific Antigen-based Screening on Morbidity and Mortality of Prostate Cancer: 21-year Follow-up Results of the Rotterdam Section of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2023; 84(4):426-434. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.016. View

2.
Gronberg H, Adolfsson J, Aly M, Nordstrom T, Wiklund P, Brandberg Y . Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50-69 years (STHLM3): a prospective population-based diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(16):1667-76. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00361-7. View

3.
Fazekas T, Shim S, Basile G, Baboudjian M, Koi T, Przydacz M . Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2024; 10(6):745-754. PMC: 10998247. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0734. View

4.
Franlund M, Mansson M, Arnsrud Godtman R, Aus G, Holmberg E, Kollberg K . Results from 22 years of Followup in the Göteborg Randomized Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial. J Urol. 2022; 208(2):292-300. PMC: 9275849. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002696. View

5.
Arnsrud Godtman R, Holmberg E, Lilja H, Stranne J, Hugosson J . Opportunistic testing versus organized prostate-specific antigen screening: outcome after 18 years in the Göteborg randomized population-based prostate cancer screening trial. Eur Urol. 2015; 68(3):354-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.006. View