» Articles » PMID: 39200731

Variability in Care Pathways for Hip Fracture Patients in The Netherlands

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Aug 29
PMID 39200731
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Integrated orthogeriatric care has demonstrated benefits in hip fracture management for older patients. Comprehensive care pathways are essential for effective integrated care delivery, yet local variability in care pathways persists. We assessed the current hip fracture care pathways in the Netherlands, focusing on the variability between these care pathways and the degree of implementation of orthogeriatric care. : A nationwide inventory study was conducted. A survey was sent to all hospitals in the Netherlands to collect the care pathways or local protocols for hip fracture care. All care elements reported in the care pathways and protocols were systematically analyzed by two independent researchers. Furthermore, an assessment was performed to determine which model of orthogeriatric care was applied. : All 71 Dutch hospitals were contacted, and 56 hospitals responded (79%), of which 46 (82%) provided a care pathway or protocol. Forty-one care elements were identified in total. In the care pathways and protocols, the variability in the description of these individual care elements ranged from 7% to 87%. Twenty-one hospitals had an integrated care model with shared responsibility, while an equal number followed an orthopedic trauma surgeon-led care model. : These findings provide a detailed description of the hip fracture care pathways in the Netherlands. Variations were observed concerning the care elements described in the care pathways, the structure of the care pathway, and the specification of several elements. The implementation of integrated care with shared responsibilities, as recommended by the international literature, has not been achieved nationwide. The clinical implications of the variability between care pathways, such as the influence on the quality of care, need to be further investigated.

Citing Articles

Defining optimal orthogeriatric hip fracture care: a delphi consensus approach.

van Bremen H, Seppala L, Gans E, Hegeman J, van der Velde N, Willems H Eur Geriatr Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39909977 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-025-01156-5.

References
1.
Werner M, Macke C, Gogol M, Krettek C, Liodakis E . Differences in hip fracture care in Europe: a systematic review of recent annual reports of hip fracture registries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021; 48(3):1625-1638. PMC: 9192454. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01797-8. View

2.
Solberg L, Vesterhus E, Hestnes I, Vali Ahmed M, Ommundsen N, Westberg M . Comparing two different orthogeriatric models of care for hip fracture patients: an observational prospective cross-sectional study. BMJ Open Qual. 2023; 12(Suppl 2). PMC: 10565326. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002302. View

3.
Hsu Y, Chou F, Wang H, Chu Y, Liao K . Effectiveness of integrated care for elderly patients with hip fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Geriatr Nurs. 2022; 49:65-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.11.012. View

4.
Baker P, Salar O, Ollivere B, Forward D, Weerasuriya N, Moppett I . Evolution of the hip fracture population: time to consider the future? A retrospective observational analysis. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(4):e004405. PMC: 3996816. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004405. View

5.
Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E, Machotta A, Gothe H, Willis J . Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (3):CD006632. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006632.pub2. View